The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linkages between plant litter decomposition, litter quality, and vegetation responses to herbivores
Open accessAbstract
Summary: There is increasing awareness that similar suites of plant traits may govern foliage palatability and litter decomposability, but whether there is an association between the response of vegetation to herbivory and litter decomposition rates across plant species remains unexplored. We collected 141 samples of litter from 59 understorey and 18 canopy tree species from a total of 28 sites under natural forest throughout New Zealand. We assessed whether variables related to decomposition and quality of litter of the understorey species showed a statistical relationship with the response of vegetation density (assessed using a pole‐intercept method) of the same species at the same locations to browsing by deer and goats. Decomposition and nutrient‐loss data from litter were obtained using standardized laboratory bioassays. There was a significant positive correlation between litter decomposition rate and the extent to which vegetation density was reduced by browsing mammals (r = 0·488, P < 0·001). Further, decomposition rate and vegetation response to herbivory were both correlated with several of the same litter quality variables. The proportion of total initial phosphorus and nitrogen released from litter during decomposition was correlated with litter decomposition rate, but not with vegetation density response to browsing. This suggests that effects of browsers on vegetation composition are more likely to influence ecosystem carbon flow than nitrogen or phosphorus flow. Litter‐mixing experiments showed that good quality litters produced by plant species reduced by browsers tended to promote the decomposition of other litters. Meanwhile, poor quality litters from species promoted by browsers tended to decompose more rapidly when mixed with other litter types than when by themselves. However, these effects were weak and likely to be less important than the more direct effects of browsing mammals on vegetation composition. The relationships between litter decomposition and effect of herbivory on vegetation density were driven primarily by differences among the main plant functional groups, which showed the same decreasing rank order for both variables: large‐leaved dicots, small‐leaved dicots, Nothofagus, ferns, and monocots. The implications of these results for understanding how herbivores affect the decomposer subsystem are considered. Because the results of this work are only partially consistent with those of an earlier study on how browsers affect decomposer organisms and processes, conducted at the same 28 field sites, other mechanisms through which browser effects are manifested below‐ground must often override that investigated in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecology of a Grazing Ecosystem: The Serengeti
McNaughton, S. J. (1985) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942578 · Cited by 1,367 · cited 1×
“Such an outcome is possible only if palatable plant species are not promoted by browsing (cf. McNaughton 1979, 1985), and in our study there was a clear pattern of such plants being only negatively affected by herbivores.”
BackgroundWardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I., & Nicholson, K. S. (1997) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546010 · Cited by 723
Self-citation
Cited by
Ecological Impacts of Deer Overabundance
Côté, S. D., Rooney, T. P., Tremblay, J.-P., Dussault, C., & Waller, D. M. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105725 · Cited by 2,079
Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review
Kuzyakov, Y., & Blagodatskaya, E. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.025 · Cited by 1,872
Mayer, M., Prescott, C. E., Abaker, W. E. A., Augusto, L., Cécillon, L., Ferreira, G. W. D., James, J., Jandl, R., Katzensteiner, K., Laclau, J.-P., et al. (2020) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118127 · Cited by 748
Plant secondary metabolites: a key driver of litter decomposition and soil nutrient cycling
Chomel, M., Guittonny‐Larchevêque, M., Fernandez, C., Gallet, C., DesRochers, A., Paré, D., Jackson, B. G., & Baldy, V. (2016) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12644 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I., & Barker, G. M.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09-23
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 585-595
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W2162291114
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linkages between plant litter decomposition, litter quality, and vegetation responses to herbivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00659.x
- The paper
- Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I., & Barker, G. M. (2002). Linkages between plant litter decomposition, litter quality, and vegetation responses to herbivores. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00659.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.