The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Werner helicase relocates into nuclear foci in response to DNA damaging agents and co‐localizes with RPA and Rad51
Open accessAbstract
Background: Werner syndrome (WS) is an autosomal recessive disorder with many features of premature ageing. Cells derived from WS patients show genomic instability, aberrations in the S‐phase and sensitivity to genotoxic agents. The gene responsible for WS (WRN) encodes a DNA helicase belonging to the RecQ helicase family. Although biochemical studies showed that the gene product of WRN (WRNp) interacts with proteins that participate in DNA metabolism, its precise biological function remains unclear. Results: Using immunocytochemistry, we found that WRNp forms distinct nuclear foci in response to DNA damaging agents, including camptothecin (CPT), etoposide, 4‐nitroquinolin‐N‐oxide and bleomycin. The presence of aphidicolin inhibited CPT‐induced WRNp foci strongly but not bleomycin‐induced foci. These WRNp foci overlapped with the foci of replication protein A (RPA) almost entirely and with the foci of Rad51 partially, implicating cooperative functions of these proteins in response to DNA damage. We also found that WRNp foci partially co‐localize with sites of 5‐bromo‐2′‐deoxy‐uridine incorporation. Conclusions: These findings suggest that WRNp form nuclear foci in response to aberrant DNA structures, including DNA double‐strand breaks and stalled replication forks. We propose that WRNp takes part in the homologous recombinational repair and in the processing of stalled replication forks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts
Nelms, B. E., Maser, R. S., MacKay, J. F., Lagally, M. G., & Petrini, J. H. J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5363.590 · Cited by 500
Schulz, V. P., Zakian, V. A., Ogburn, C. E., McKay, J., Jarzebowicz, A. A., Martin, G. M., & Edland, S. D. (1996) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf02346184 · Cited by 221
Tahara, H., Tokutake, Y., Maeda, S., Kataoka, H., Watanabe, T., Satoh, M., Matsumoto, T., Sugawara, M., Ide, T., Goto, M., et al. (1997) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1201377 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Cited by
Bernstein, C. (2002) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/s1383-5742(02)00009-1 · Cited by 527
Recombinational DNA repair and human disease
Thompson, L. H., & Schild, D. (2002) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00224-5 · Cited by 417
PML nuclear bodies: dynamic sensors of DNA damage and cellular stress
Dellaire, G., & Bazett‐Jones, D. P. (2004) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20089 · Cited by 405
DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination
Dudáš, A., & Chovanec, M. (2004) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.07.001 · Cited by 271
Taylor, T. J., & Knipe, D. M. (2004) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.78.11.5856-5866.2004 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Sakamoto, S., Nishikawa, K., Heo, S., Goto, M., Furuichi, Y., & Shimamoto, A.
- Venue
- Genes to Cells
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 421-430
- ISSN
- 1356-9597 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2443
- OpenAlex
- W2025350653
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Werner helicase relocates into nuclear foci in response to DNA damaging agents and co‐localizes with RPA and Rad51. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2443.2001.00433.x
- The paper
- Sakamoto, S., Nishikawa, K., Heo, S., Goto, M., Furuichi, Y., & Shimamoto, A. (2001). Werner helicase relocates into nuclear foci in response to DNA damaging agents and co‐localizes with RPA and Rad51. Genes to Cells. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.2001.00433.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.