The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monte-Carlo inversion for a global shear-velocity model of the crust and upper mantle
Open accessAbstract
We describe a method to invert surface wave dispersion data for a model of shear velocities with uncertainties in the crust and uppermost mantle. The inversion is a multistep process, constrained by a priori information, that culminates in a Markov-chain Monte-Carlo sampling of model space to yield an ensemble of acceptable models at each spatial node. The model is radially anisotropic in the uppermost mantle to an average depth of about 200 km and is isotropic elsewhere. The method is applied on a 2°× 2° grid globally to a large data set of fundamental mode surface wave group and phase velocities (Rayleigh group velocity, 16–200 s; Love group velocity, 16–150 s; Rayleigh and Love phase velocity, 40–150 s). The middle of the ensemble (Median Model) defines the estimated model and the half-width of the corridor of models provides the uncertainty estimate. Uncertainty estimates allow the identification of the robust features of the model which, typically, persist only to depths of ∼250 km. We refer to the features that appear in every member of the ensemble of acceptable models as ‘persistent’. Persistent features include sharper images of the variation of oceanic lithosphere and asthenosphere with age, continental roots, extensional tectonic features in the upper mantle, the shallow parts of subducted lithosphere, and improved resolution of radial anisotropy. In particular, we find no compelling evidence for ‘negative anisotropy’ anywhere in the world's lithosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Cited by
Shen, W., Ritzwoller, M. H., Kang, D., Kim, Y., Lin, F.-C., Ning, J., Wang, W., Zheng, Y., & Zhou, L. (2016) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggw175 · Cited by 382
Self-citationThickness of the central and eastern European lithosphere as seen by S receiver functions
Geissler, W. H., Sodoudi, F., & Kind, R. (2010) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04548.x · Cited by 114
Ravikumar, M., Singh, B., Pavan Kumar, V., Satyakumar, A. V., Ramesh, D. S., & Tiwari, V. M. (2020) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/2020tc006219 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapiro, N. M., & Ritzwoller, M. H.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-105
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2128135732
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monte-Carlo inversion for a global shear-velocity model of the crust and upper mantle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01742.x
- The paper
- Shapiro, N. M., & Ritzwoller, M. H. (2002). Monte-Carlo inversion for a global shear-velocity model of the crust and upper mantle. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01742.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.