The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parsimonious Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion in a nonlinear geophysical problem
Open accessAbstract
Summary: A key element in the solution of a geophysical inverse problem is the quantification of non-uniqueness, that is, how much parameters of an inferred earth model can vary while fitting a set of measurements. A widely used approach is that of Bayesian inference, where Bayes' rule is used to determine the uncertainty of the earth model parameters a posteriori given the data. I describe here, a natural extension of Bayesian parameter estimation that accounts for the posterior probability of how complex an earth model is (specifically, how many layers it contains). This approach has a built-in parsimony criterion: among all earth models that fit the data, those with fewer parameters (fewer layers) have higher posterior probabilities. To implement this approach in practice, I use a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm applied to the nonlinear problem of inverting DC resistivity sounding data to infer characteristics of a 1-D earth model. The earth model is parametrized as a layered medium, where the number of layers and their resistivities and thicknesses are poorly known a priori. The algorithm obtains a sample of layered media from the posterior distribution; this sample measures non-uniqueness in terms of how many layers are effectively resolved by the data and of the range of layer thicknesses and resistivities consistent with the data. Because the complexity of the model is effectively determined by the data, the solution does not need to be regularized. This is a desirable feature, because requiring the solution to be smooth beyond what is implied by prior information can lead to underestimating posterior uncertainty. Letting the number of layers be a free parameter, as done here, broadens the space of earth models possible a priori and makes the determination of posterior uncertainty less dependent on the parametrization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5638 · Cited by 17,933
Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 · Cited by 16,627
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Numerical recipes in Pascal: the art of scientific computing
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5158 · Cited by 11,811
Jeffreys, H., Moran, P. A. P., & Chatfield, C. (1922) · Nature · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198503682.001.0001 · Cited by 7,878
Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice
(1995) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14835 · Cited by 7,757
The Advanced Theory of Statistics.
Clarke, G. M., Kendall, M., & Stuart, A. (1978) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344782 · Cited by 6,658
General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787 · Cited by 6,045
Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination
GREEN, P. J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.711 · Cited by 5,930
Cited by
Transdimensional inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion
Bodin, T., Sambridge, M., Gallagher, K., & Rawlinson, N. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2011jb008560 · Cited by 462
Transdimensional inference in the geosciences
Sambridge, M., Bodin, T., Gallagher, K., & Tkalčić, H. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0547 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Malinverno, A.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 675-688
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2152415136
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parsimonious Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion in a nonlinear geophysical problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01847.x
- The paper
- Malinverno, A. (2002). Parsimonious Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion in a nonlinear geophysical problem. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01847.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.