Cited by 170Seismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsSeismic Waves and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transdimensional inference in the geosciences

Sambridge, M., Bodin, T., Gallagher, K., Tkalčić, H.·2013·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Seismologists construct images of the Earth's interior structure using observations, derived from seismograms, collected at the surface. A common approach to such inverse problems is to build a single 'best' Earth model, in some sense. This is despite the fact that the observations by themselves often do not require, or even allow, a single best-fit Earth model to exist. Interpretation of optimal models can be fraught with difficulties, particularly when formal uncertainty estimates become heavily dependent on the regularization imposed. Similar issues occur across the physical sciences with model construction in ill-posed problems. An alternative approach is to embrace the non-uniqueness directly and employ an inference process based on parameter space sampling. Instead of seeking a best model within an optimization framework, one seeks an ensemble of solutions and derives properties of that ensemble for inspection. While this idea has itself been employed for more than 30 years, it is now receiving increasing attention in the geosciences. Recently, it has been shown that transdimensional and hierarchical sampling methods have some considerable benefits for problems involving multiple parameter types, uncertain data errors and/or uncertain model parametrizations, as are common in seismology. Rather than being forced to make decisions on parametrization, the level of data noise and the weights between data types in advance, as is often the case in an optimization framework, t…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2011.0547

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1029/2001GC000213 · DOI
  2. 10.1029/2003JB002652 · DOI
  3. Okabe A, 1992, Spatial tessellations: concepts and applications of Voronoi diagrams
  4. 10.1016/S0065-2687(03)46002-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1190/1.3073002 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03409.x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.10.020 · DOI
  8. Mackay DJC, 2003, Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms
  9. Denison DGT, 2002, Bayesian methods for nonlinear classification and regression
  10. 10.1190/1.6241045.1 · DOI
  11. McGrayne SB, 1987, The theory that would not die: how Bayes' rule cracked the enigma code, hunted down Russian submarines, and emerged triumphant from two centuries of controversy
  12. 10.1098/rstl.1763.0053 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03155.x · DOI
  14. Gilks W, 1996, Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice
  15. 10.1093/biomet/82.4.711 · DOI
  16. Geyer CJ, 1994, Simulation procedures and likelihood inference for spatial point processes, Scand. J. Stat., 21, 359
  17. 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01847.x · DOI
  18. 10.1190/1.1778243 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.11.027 · DOI
  20. 10.1029/2011JB008825 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00369.x · DOI
  22. Reading AM, 2010, In Conf. Handbook: 21st Int. Geophysical Conf. & Exhibition, Future Discoveries are in our Hands, Sydney, Australia, 22–24 August 2010, 1
  23. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03596.x · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04192.x · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11004-005-9109-3 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00496.x · DOI
  27. 10.1088/0266-5611/25/5/055009 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04226.x · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05414.x · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04530.x · DOI
  31. 10.1029/2011JB008560 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1121/1.3500674 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05165.x · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05302.x · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.01.003 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.09.015 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/1467-9868.03711 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.spl.2004.06.025 · DOI
  39. 10.1190/1.1444928 · DOI
  40. Aster R, 2005, Parameter estimation and inverse problems
  41. 10.1029/JB095iB10p15303 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1990.tb04588.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Sambridge, M., Bodin, T., Gallagher, K., & Tkalčić, H.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Géosciences Rennes (FR)
Corresponding author
Sambridge, M.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2013-02-13
Volume
371
Issue
1984
Pages
20110547
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W1971072157
Cited by
170
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7
FWCI
16.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Seismic Waves and Analysis
Keywords
hierarchical sampling, seismic inversion, Earth's interior, ill-posed problems, non-uniqueness, parameter space sampling, model uncertainty, regularization, noisy data, model parameterization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transdimensional inference in the geosciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.2011.0547
The paper
Sambridge, M., Bodin, T., Gallagher, K., & Tkalčić, H. (2013). Transdimensional inference in the geosciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0547