The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Particulate pollution capture by urban trees: effect of species and windspeed
Abstract
Summary: Particulate pollution is a serious health problem throughout the world, exacerbating a wide range of respiratory and vascular illnesses in urban areas. The use of trees to reduce the effects of these pollutants has been addressed in the literature, but has rarely been quantified. The aim of the present study was to quantify the effectiveness of five tree species − pine (Pinus nigra var. maritima), cypress ( × Cupressocyparis leylandii), maple (Acer campestre), whitebeam (Sorbus intermedia), poplar (Populus deltoides × trichocarpa‘Beaupré’) − in capturing pollutant particles. This was achieved by exposing them to NaCl droplets of approximately 1 μm diameter at a range of windspeeds in two windtunnels. The deposition velocity (Vg) and particle trapping efficiency (Cp) were calculated from these exposures. In addition, a variable dependent on foliage structure [Stokes number (St)] was correlated with Cp to gauge the effect of tree morphology on particle capture. Maximum Cp values ranged from 2.8% for P. nigra, to 0.12% and 0.06% for P. trichocarpa×deltoides and A. campertre, respectively. The finer, more complex structure of the foliage of the two conifers (P. nigra and C. leylandii) explained their much greater effectiveness at capturing particles. The data presented here will be used to model the effectiveness of tree planting schemes in improving urban air quality by capturing pollutant particles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities
Dockery, D. W., Pope, C. A., Xu, X., Spengler, J. D., Ware, J. H., Fay, M. E., Ferris, B. G., & Speizer, F. E. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312093292401 · Cited by 8,018
Cited by
Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration
Myers, S. S., Gaffikin, L., Golden, C. D., Ostfeld, R. S., H. Redford, K., H. Ricketts, T., Turner, W. R., & Osofsky, S. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218656110 · Cited by 501
Freer-Smith, P. H., Beckett, K. P., & Taylor, G. (2005) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.03.031 · Cited by 377
Self-citationOn the reduction of urban particle concentration by vegetation a review
Litschke, T., & Kuttler, W. (2008) · Meteorologische Zeitschrift · doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0284 · Cited by 276
Freer-Smith, P. H., El-Khatib, A. A., & Taylor, G. (2004) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1023/b:wate.0000026521.99552.fd · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beckett, K. P., Freer‐Smith, P. H., & Taylor, G.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 995-1003
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2016075304
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particulate pollution capture by urban trees: effect of species and windspeed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00376.x
- The paper
- Beckett, K. P., Freer‐Smith, P. H., & Taylor, G. (2000). Particulate pollution capture by urban trees: effect of species and windspeed. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00376.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.