Cited by 501Climate Change and Health ImpactsPublic Health and Environmental IssuesLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration

Open access
Myers, Samuel S., Gaffikin, Lynne, Golden, Christopher D., Ostfeld, Richard S., H. Redford, Kent, H. Ricketts, Taylor, Turner, Will R., Osofsky, Steven A.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Human activity is rapidly transforming most of Earth’s natural systems. How this transformation is impacting human health, whose health is at greatest risk, and the magnitude of the associated disease burden are relatively new subjects within the field of environmental health. We discuss what is known about the human health implications of changes in the structure and function of natural systems and propose that these changes are affecting human health in a variety of important ways. We identify several gaps and limitations in the research that has been done to date and propose a more systematic and comprehensive approach to applied research in this field. Such efforts could lead to a more robust understanding of the human health impacts of accelerating environmental change and inform decision making in the land-use planning, environmental conservation, and public health policy realms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1218656110

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced biodiversity of both wild and agricultural species can have detrimental effects for diet quality and environmental sustainability by reducing availability and access to nutritious, seasonal foods and loss of ecosystem functions.

    “Reduced biodiversity of both wild and agricultural species can have detrimental effects for diet quality and environmental sustainability by reducing availability and access to nutritious, seasonal foods and loss of ecosystem functions (14).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Johnstone LC (2008) Planning for the inevitable, the humanitarian consequences of climate change. Linking Climate Change Negotiations and Disaster Risk Reduction Conference, November 12-13, 2008, Copenhagen. Available at www.unhcr.org/ 49256c492.html. Accessed October 28, 2013. 85
  2. Caulfield LE, Black RE (2004) Zinc deficiency. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attribution to Selected Major Risk Factors, eds Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL (World Health Organization, Geneva), Vol 1, pp 257-280.
  3. Stoltzfus RJ, Mullany L, Black RE (2004) Iron deficiency anaemia. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attribution to Selected Major Risk Factors, eds Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL (World Health Organization, Geneva), Vol 1, pp 163-210. 100
  4. Goldberg TL, Paige S, Chapman C (2012) The Kibale EcoHealth Project: Exploring connections among human health, animal health, and landscape dynamics in Western Uganda. New Directions in Conservation Medicine: Applied Cases of Ecological Health, eds Aguirre A, Ostfeld R, Daszak P (Oxford Univ Press, New York), pp 452-465. 104

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myers, S. S., Gaffikin, L., Golden, C. D., Ostfeld, R. S., H. Redford, K., H. Ricketts, T., Turner, W. R., & Osofsky, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Evaluation and Research Technologies for Health Inc., Woodside, CA 94062;
  • Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US)
  • Wildlife Conservation Society Institute and
  • Gund Institute for Ecological Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405; and
  • Conservation International (US)
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-11-11
Volume
110
Issue
47
Pages
18753-18760
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2039347482
Cited by
501
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 17
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Rockefeller Foundation
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
ecosystem change, human health effects, environmental change, disease burden, environmental health, land use planning, environmental protection, public health policy
MeSH terms
Environmental Health, Health Status, Humans, Human Activities, Research, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review