Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris

Rehfeldt, Gerald E., Tchebakova, Nadejda M., Parfenova, Yelena I., Wykoff, William R., Kuzmina, Nina A., Milyutin, Leonid I.·2002·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Abstract Five population‐specific response functions were developed from quadratic models for 110 populations of Pinus sylvestris growing at 47 planting sites in Eurasia and North America. The functions predict 13 year height from climate: degree‐days > 5 °C; mean annual temperature; degree‐days < 0 °C; summer‐winter temperature differential; and a moisture index, the ratio of degree‐days > 5 °C to mean annual precipitation. Validation of the response functions with two sets of independent data produced for all functions statistically significant simple correlations with coefficients as high as 0.81 between actual and predicted heights. The response functions described the widely different growth potentials typical of natural populations and demonstrated that these growth potentials have different climatic optima. Populations nonetheless tend to inhabit climates colder than their optima, with the disparity between the optimal and inhabited climates becoming greater as the climate becomes more severe. When driven by a global warming scenario of the Hadley Center, the functions described short‐term physiologic and long‐term evolutionary effects that were geographically complex. The short‐term effects should be negative in the warmest climates but strongly positive in the coldest. Long‐term effects eventually should ameliorate the negative short‐term impacts, enhance the positive, and in time, substantially increase productivity throughout most of the contemporary pine forests of Eurasia. Realizing the long‐term gains will require redistribution of genotypes across the landscape, a process that should take up to 13 generations and therefore many years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00516.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
Rehfeldt, G. E., Tchebakova, N. M., Parfenova, Y. I., Wykoff, W. R., Kuzmina, N. A., & Milyutin, L. I.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08-21
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
912-929
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2152114451
Cited by
385
References
1
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00516.x
The paper
Rehfeldt, G. E., Tchebakova, N. M., Parfenova, Y. I., Wykoff, W. R., Kuzmina, N. A., & Milyutin, L. I. (2002). Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00516.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.