The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris
Abstract
Abstract Five population‐specific response functions were developed from quadratic models for 110 populations of Pinus sylvestris growing at 47 planting sites in Eurasia and North America. The functions predict 13 year height from climate: degree‐days > 5 °C; mean annual temperature; degree‐days < 0 °C; summer‐winter temperature differential; and a moisture index, the ratio of degree‐days > 5 °C to mean annual precipitation. Validation of the response functions with two sets of independent data produced for all functions statistically significant simple correlations with coefficients as high as 0.81 between actual and predicted heights. The response functions described the widely different growth potentials typical of natural populations and demonstrated that these growth potentials have different climatic optima. Populations nonetheless tend to inhabit climates colder than their optima, with the disparity between the optimal and inhabited climates becoming greater as the climate becomes more severe. When driven by a global warming scenario of the Hadley Center, the functions described short‐term physiologic and long‐term evolutionary effects that were geographically complex. The short‐term effects should be negative in the warmest climates but strongly positive in the coldest. Long‐term effects eventually should ameliorate the negative short‐term impacts, enhance the positive, and in time, substantially increase productivity throughout most of the contemporary pine forests of Eurasia. Realizing the long‐term gains will require redistribution of genotypes across the landscape, a process that should take up to 13 generations and therefore many years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Cited by
Why does phenology drive species distribution?
Chuine, I. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0142 · Cited by 734
Long‐distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change
Kremer, A., Ronce, O., Robledo‐Arnuncio, J. J., Guillaume, F., Bohrer, G., Nathan, R., Bridle, J. R., Gomulkiewicz, R., Klein, E. K., Ritland, K., et al. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01746.x · Cited by 677
Empirical Analyses of Plant‐Climate Relationships for the Western United States
Rehfeldt, G. E., Crookston, N. L., Warwell, M. V., & Evans, J. S. (2006) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/507711 · Cited by 490
Self-citationClimate fails to predict wood decomposition at regional scales
Bradford, M. A., Warren II, R. J., Baldrian, P., Crowther, T. W., Maynard, D. S., Oldfield, E. E., Wieder, W. R., Wood, S. A., & King, J. R. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2251 · Cited by 365
The forest vegetation simulator: A review of its structure, content, and applications
Crookston, N. L., & Dixon, G. E. (2005) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2005.02.003 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Rehfeldt, G. E., Tchebakova, N. M., Parfenova, Y. I., Wykoff, W. R., Kuzmina, N. A., & Milyutin, L. I.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08-21
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 912-929
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2152114451
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00516.x
- The paper
- Rehfeldt, G. E., Tchebakova, N. M., Parfenova, Y. I., Wykoff, W. R., Kuzmina, N. A., & Milyutin, L. I. (2002). Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00516.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.