Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 677

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long‐distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change

Open access
Kremer, Antoine, Ronce, Ophélie, Robledo‐Arnuncio, Juan J., Guillaume, Frédéric, Bohrer, Gil, Nathan, Ran, Bridle, Jon R., Gomulkiewicz, Richard, Klein, Etienne K., Ritland, Kermit, Kuparinen, Anna, Gerber, Sophie, Schueler, Silvio·2012·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Ecology Letters (2012) 15: 378–392 Forest trees are the dominant species in many parts of the world and predicting how they might respond to climate change is a vital global concern. Trees are capable of long‐distance gene flow, which can promote adaptive evolution in novel environments by increasing genetic variation for fitness. It is unclear, however, if this can compensate for maladaptive effects of gene flow and for the long‐generation times of trees. We critically review data on the extent of long‐distance gene flow and summarise theory that allows us to predict evolutionary responses of trees to climate change. Estimates of long‐distance gene flow based both on direct observations and on genetic methods provide evidence that genes can move over spatial scales larger than habitat shifts predicted under climate change within one generation. Both theoretical and empirical data suggest that the positive effects of gene flow on adaptation may dominate in many instances. The balance of positive to negative consequences of gene flow may, however, differ for leading edge, core and rear sections of forest distributions. We propose future experimental and theoretical research that would better integrate dispersal biology with evolutionary quantitative genetics and improve predictions of tree responses to climate change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01746.x

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Cited by

See all 677

Metadata

Authors
Kremer, A., Ronce, O., Robledo‐Arnuncio, J. J., Guillaume, F., Bohrer, G., Nathan, R., Bridle, J. R., Gomulkiewicz, R., Klein, E. K., Ritland, K., Kuparinen, A., Gerber, S., & Schueler, S.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-28
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
378-392
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W2142465460
Cited by
677
References
80
FWCI
26.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01746.x
The paper
Kremer, A., Ronce, O., Robledo‐Arnuncio, J. J., Guillaume, F., Bohrer, G., Nathan, R., Bridle, J. R., Gomulkiewicz, R., Klein, E. K., Ritland, K., Kuparinen, A., Gerber, S., & Schueler, S. (2012). Long‐distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01746.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.