The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new assessment of European forests carbon exchanges by eddy fluxes and artificial neural network spatialization
Abstract
Recently flux tower data have become available for a variety of ecosystems under different climatic and edaphic conditions. Although Flux tower data represent point measurements with a footprint of typically 1 km × 1 km they can be used to validate models and to spatialize biospheric fluxes at regional and continental scales. In this paper we present a study where biospheric flux data collected in the EUROFLUX project were used to train a neural network simulator to provide spatial (1 km × 1 km) and temporal (weekly) estimates of carbon fluxes of European forests at continental scale. The novelty of the approach is that flux data were used to constrain and parameterize the neural network structure using a limited number of input driving variables. The overall European carbon uptake from this analysis was 0.47 Gt C yr−1 with distinctive differences between boreal and temperate regions. The length of the growing season is longer in the south of Europe (about 32 weeks), compared with north and central Europe, which have a similar length‐growing season (about 27 weeks). A peak in respiration was depicted in spring at continental scale as a coherent signal which parallel the construction respiration increase at the onset of the season as usually shown by leaf level measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Cited by
Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 · Cited by 5,673
Baldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
Europe's Terrestrial Biosphere Absorbs 7 to 12% of European Anthropogenic CO 2 Emissions
Janssens, I. A., Freibauer, A., Ciais, P., Smith, P., Nabuurs, G.-J., Folberth, G., Schlamadinger, B., Hutjes, R. W. A., Ceulemans, R., Schulze, E.-D., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083592 · Cited by 601
Self-citationREICHSTEIN, M., CIAIS, P., PAPALE, D., VALENTINI, R., RUNNING, S., VIOVY, N., CRAMER, W., GRANIER, A., OGÉE, J., ALLARD, V., et al. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01224.x · Cited by 580
Self-citationCold season emissions dominate the arctic tundra methane budget
Zona, D., Gioli, B., Commane, R., Lindaas, J., Wofsy, S. C., Miller, C. E., Dinardo, S. J., Dengel, S., Sweeney, C., Karion, A., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1516017113 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- PAPALE, D., & VALENTINI, R.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 525-535
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2036197592
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new assessment of European forests carbon exchanges by eddy fluxes and artificial neural network spatialization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00609.x
- The paper
- PAPALE, D., & VALENTINI, R. (2003). A new assessment of European forests carbon exchanges by eddy fluxes and artificial neural network spatialization. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00609.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.