Cited by 5,673Hydrological Forecasting Using AIModel Reduction and Neural NetworksMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science

Open access
Reichstein, Markus, Camps-Valls, Gustau, Stevens, Bjorn, Jung, Martin, Denzler, Joachim, Carvalhais, Nuno, Prabhat·2019·Nature

Abstract

Machine learning approaches are increasingly used to extract patterns and insights from the ever-increasing stream of geospatial data, but current approaches may not be optimal when system behaviour is dominated by spatial or temporal context. Here, rather than amending classical machine learning, we argue that these contextual cues should be used as part of deep learning (an approach that is able to extract spatio-temporal features automatically) to gain further process understanding of Earth system science problems, improving the predictive ability of seasonal forecasting and modelling of long-range spatial connections across multiple timescales, for example. The next step will be a hybrid modelling approach, coupling physical process models with the versatility of data-driven machine learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods based on various forms of artificial intelligence are already today being applied in a number of research fields related to climate change and environmental monitoring.

    “Methods based on various forms of artificial intelligence are already today being applied in a number of research fields related to climate change and environmental monitoring.”

    From Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability (2021) · cites this paper as [26]

  • Hybrid models leveraging both deep learning and bio-physical models tend to be less data-intensive, avoid incoherent predictions, and are generally more interpretable than purely data-driven models.

    “such hybrid models tend to be less data-intensive, avoid incoherent predictions, and are generally more interpretable than purely data-driven models.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

  • The hybrid models paradigm is one of the most exciting avenues in modern ML and promises real collaboration between domains of application and ML, especially when coupled with algorithmic designs that allow interpretation and understanding of visual cues.

    “This “hybrid models” paradigm48,50 is one of the most exciting avenues in modern ML and promises real collaboration between domains of application and ML, especially when coupled with algorithmic designs that allow interpretation and understanding of the visual cues that are being used136.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Reichstein, Markus
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-02
Volume
566
Issue
7743
Pages
195-204
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2913323966
Cited by
5,673
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 1399 · 2025: 960 · 2024: 824 · 2023: 726 · 2022: 690 · 2021: 640 · 2020: 331 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 1
FWCI
30.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
deep learning, Earth system science, spatio-temporal context, process understanding, seasonal forecasting, multiscale modeling, hybrid physical-machine learning models, geospatial data, data-driven modeling
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Deep Learning, Big Data, Computer Simulation, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Regression, Psychology, Seasons, Time Factors, Translating, Weather, Reproducibility of Results, Knowledge, Uncertainty, Earth Sciences, Spatio-Temporal Analysis, Geographic Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review