The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of vascular plants on carbon turnover and methane emissions from a tundra wetland
Abstract
This paper investigates how vascular plants affect carbon flow and the formation and emission of the greenhouse gas methane (CH 4) in an arctic wet tundra ecosystem in NE Greenland. We present a field experiment where we studied, in particular, how species‐specific root exudation patterns affect the availability of acetate, a hypothesized precursor of CH 4 formation. We found significantly higher acetate formation rates in the root vicinity of Eriophorum scheuchzeri compared with another dominating sedge in the wetland, i.e. Dupontia psilosantha. Furthermore a shading treatment, which reduced net photosynthesis, resulted in significantly decreased formation rates of acetate. We also found that the potential CH 4 production of the peat profile was highly positively correlated to the concentration of acetate at the respective depths, whereas it was negatively correlated to the concentration of total dissolved organic carbon. This suggests that acetate is a substrate of importance to the methanogens in the studied ecosystem and that acetate concentration in this case can serve as a predictor of substrate quality. To further investigate the importance of acetate as a predecessor to CH 4, we brought an intact peat‐plant monolith system collected at the field site in NE Greenland to the laboratory, sealed it hermetically and studied the decomposition of 14 C‐labelled acetate injected at the depth of methanogenic activity. After 4 h, 14 CH 4 emission from the monolith could be observed. In conclusion, allocation of recently fixed carbon to the roots of certain species of vascular plants affects substrate quality and influence CH 4 formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes
De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Bardgett, R. D. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x · Cited by 1,431
Carbon Storage and Fluxes within Freshwater Wetlands: a Critical Review
Kayranli, B., Scholz, M., Mustafa, A., & Hedmark, Å. (2010) · Wetlands · doi:10.1007/s13157-009-0003-4 · Cited by 690
Export of dissolved organic carbon from peatlands under elevated carbon dioxide levels
Freeman, C., Fenner, N., Ostle, N. J., Kang, H., Dowrick, D. J., Reynolds, B., Lock, M. A., Sleep, D., Hughes, S., & Hudson, J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02707 · Cited by 678
Effects of water level alteration on carbon cycling in peatlands
Zhong, Y., Jiang, M., & Middleton, B. A. (2020) · Ecosystem Health and Sustainability · doi:10.1080/20964129.2020.1806113 · Cited by 106
Falk, J. M., Schmidt, N. M., Christensen, T. R., & Ström, L. (2015) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/045001 · Cited by 93
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ström, L., Ekberg, A., Mastepanov, M., & Røjle Christensen, T.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07-30
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1185-1192
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2149331343
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of vascular plants on carbon turnover and methane emissions from a tundra wetland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00655.x
- The paper
- Ström, L., Ekberg, A., Mastepanov, M., & Røjle Christensen, T. (2003). The effect of vascular plants on carbon turnover and methane emissions from a tundra wetland. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00655.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.