Cited by 3Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHemophilia Treatment and ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Health outcome assessment: SF-36 in English and Spanish

Rodriguez‐Merchan, E. C.·2003·Haemophilia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2003.00770.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodriguez‐Merchan, E. C.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
Corresponding author
Rodriguez‐Merchan, E. C.
Venue
Haemophilia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04-10
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
343-344
ISSN
  • 1351-8216 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2516
OpenAlex
W2134476850
Cited by
3
References
2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Haemophilia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemophilia Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
SF-36, health-related quality of life, Spanish translation, English-Spanish translation, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, England, Health Status Indicators, Hemophilia A, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Spain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review