The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Access to medicines: cost as an influence on the views and behaviour of patients
Abstract
The present paper explores how charges for medicines incurred by patients influence their decisions for managing acute or chronic conditions, and whether prescription cost and affordability issues are discussed in the general practitioner (GP)-patient encounter. People suffering from dyspepsia, hay fever or hypertension, or those taking hormone replacement therapy, were recruited through three community pharmacies in the North-west of England. Six focus groups were conducted with a total of 31 participants, the majority of whom were non-exempt from prescription charges. The management behaviour of those participants who had to pay for their prescriptions, particularly those from less-affluent or deprived backgrounds, was influenced by cost. However, cost was not the overriding influence, with other factors, such as symptom or disease severity, effectiveness, or necessity of treatment, playing a more important part in participants' management decisions. Cost as an issue was reflected in the various strategies used by participants to reduce medication cost, such as not having some prescribed items dispensed, taking a smaller dose or buying a cheaper over-the-counter product. Despite the use of numerous strategies, participants did not talk to their GPs about issues of cost and affordability. Participants felt that paying for prescriptions was their problem. There was a belief that discussing cost issues could jeopardise the doctor-patient relationship. Although not the dominant factor, medication cost nevertheless influenced participants when deciding how to manage their condition. Awareness of the existence of prepayment certificates, which can be bought by patients who require regular medication, was low, and this should be addressed through improved information/dissemination. Despite the high level of prescription items exempt, the current level of the prescription charge is still a barrier to obtaining prescription medicines under the National Health Service to those on lower incomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Referral implies that a GP has identified particular features of candidacy and is seeking to match those to a service that deals with that form of candidacy, but patients can resist being referred [42,63] and can resist offers of medication [64,65].”
From Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006) · cites this paper as [65]
Citations
Cites
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
McQuarrie, E. F., & Krueger, R. A. (1989) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172912 · Cited by 15,489
Research Methods in Health. Investigating health and health services
Bowling, A. (1997) · Research Repository (Kingston University London) · Cited by 1,636
(2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203413081 · Cited by 1,516
The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial Results
(1984) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03340270043026 · Cited by 1,404
Adverse Events Associated With Prescription Drug Cost-Sharing Among Poor and Elderly Persons
Tamblyn, R. M. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.4.421 · Cited by 874
Patient non-compliance: Deviance or reasoned decision-making?
Donovan, J. L., & Blake, D. R. (1992) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90206-6 · Cited by 785
Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study
Barry, C. A. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1246 · Cited by 585
Treatment adherence and risk of death after a myocardial infarction
Horwitz, R. I., Viscoli, C. M., Donaldson, R. M., Murray, C. J. L., Ransohoff, D. F., Horwitz, R. I., Berkman, L. F., Horwitz, S. M., Ransohoff, D. F., & Sindelar, J. L. (1990) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)92095-y · Cited by 453
Prevalence of symptoms of dyspepsia in the community.
Jones, R. H., & LYDEARD, S. (1989) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.298.6665.30 · Cited by 429
Payment Restrictions for Prescription Drugs under Medicaid
Soumerai, S. B., Avorn, J., Ross‐Degnan, D., & Gortmaker, S. L. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198708273170906 · Cited by 409
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Anonymous, 2000, Antihypertensive compliance and stroke risk, Pharmaceutical Journal, 10, 642
- British Medical Association General Practitioners’ Committee, 2001, The Future of Prescribing. Discussion Paper
- Department of Health, 1999, Statistics of Prescriptions Dispensed in the Community: England 1988 to 1998
- Department of Health, 2000, Pharmacy in the Future - Implementing the NHS Plan
- Hassell, 1996, The use of focus groups in pharmacy research: processes and practicalities, Journal of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13, 169
- Nathan, 1996, A non-prescription medicines formulary. 4. Hay fever treatments, Pharmaceutical Journal, 256, 188
- Phelps, 2001, Unhealthy Charges. CAB Evidence on the Impact of Health Charges
- Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 1997, From Compliance to Concordance: Achieving Shared Goals in Medicine Taking.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–105 of 105
Holbrook, A. M., Wang, M., Lee, M., Chen, Z., Garcia, M., Nguyen, L., Ford, A., Manji, S., & Law, M. R. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13531898
Holbrook, A. M., Wang, M., Lee, M., Chen, Z., Garcia, M., Nguyen, L., Ford, A., Manji, S., & Law, M. R. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13531901
DECEPTIVE ELEMENTS IN FOOD SUPPLEMENT ADVERTISEMENTS
Kazaz, A., & ERDOĞAN, M. G. (2020) · DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Explainable machine learning analysis of medicine pricing and life expectancy across countries
Govind, A., George, A. B., & Arif, M. (2026) · Discover Health Systems · doi:10.1007/s44250-026-00360-9
Perverse incentives and ethical challenges for prescribing in English general practice
Parker, J., & Davies, B. (2026) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp.2026.0213
Metadata
- Authors
- Schafheutle, E. I., Hassell, K., & Noyce, P. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Venue
- Health & Social Care in the Community
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2002-04-30
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 187-195
- ISSN
- 0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076062096
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 13.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Keywords
- prescription charges, drug affordability, patient decision-making, socioeconomic deprivation, physician-patient relationship, dyspepsia, allergic rhinitis, hypertension, hormone replacement therapy, National Health Service
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Decision Making, England, Fees, Pharmaceutical, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Physician-Patient Relations, Cost Sharing, Focus Groups, Drugs, Essential
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review