Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 655

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tumour `budding' as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer

Ueno, H, Murphy, J, Jass, J R, Mochizuki, H, Talbot, I C·2002·Histopathology

Abstract

Tumour `budding' as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer Aims: Although the characteristic of invasive pattern which contributes to Jass's classification is a sensitive prognostic marker in rectal cancer, reproducibility of its assessment has been shown to be problematic. As another histological parameter of invasive margin, we examined the prognostic significance of tumour ‘budding’ and attempted to establish its appropriate criteria. Methods and results: A total of 638 rectal cancer specimens was examined. We defined tumour `budding' as an isolated single cancer cell or a cluster composed of fewer than five cancer cells. We divided these into two groups by their intensity, i.e. the number of `budding' foci within a microscopic field of × 250. Rectal cancer with high‐grade `budding' (≥ 10 foci in a field) was observed in 30.1% of patients, and was associated with lower 5‐year survival rates (40.7%) than patients with low‐grade `budding' (84.0%) (P < 0.0001). Based on multivariate analysis, tumour `budding' was selected as the significant independent variable, together with the number of nodes involved, extramural spread, lymphocytic infiltration, apical nodal involvement and tumour differentiation. Kappa coefficient of two‐graded tumour `budding' in the intraobserver study was 0.84. Conclusions: Because of its value as a prognostic indicator and its reproducibility, tumour `budding' would be a good index to estimate the aggressiveness of rectal cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.01324.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 655

Metadata

Authors
Ueno, H., Murphy, J., Jass, J. R., Mochizuki, H., & Talbot, I. C.
Venue
Histopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01-28
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
127-132
ISSN
  • 0309-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2559
OpenAlex
W1983532504
Cited by
655
References
0
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumour `budding' as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.01324.x
The paper
Ueno, H., Murphy, J., Jass, J. R., Mochizuki, H., & Talbot, I. C. (2002). Tumour `budding' as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer. Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.01324.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.