Cited by 180Malaria Research and ControlNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Interleukin‐10 modulates susceptibility in experimental cerebral malaria

Open access
KOSSODO, S., MONSO, C., JUILLARD, P., VELU, T., GOLDMAN, M., GRAU, G. E.·1997·Immunology

Abstract

In this study, we examined the effects of interleukin‐10 (IL‐10) on the outcome of experimental cerebral malaria (CM), a lethal neurological syndrome that occurs in susceptible strains of mice after infection with Plasmodium berghei ANKA (PbA). Constitutive IL‐10 mRNA levels were significantly higher in the spleen and brain of resistant animals. In vivo neutralization of endogenous IL‐10 in CM‐resistant mice induced the neurological syndrome in 35·7% of these mice, as opposed to 7·7% in controls. IL‐10 inhibited PbA antigen‐specific interferon‐ & gamma; (IFN‐ & gamma;) production in vitro but not tumour necrosis factor (TNF) serum levels in vivo . Susceptible mice, on the other hand, were significantly protected against CM when injected with recombinant IL‐10. Overall, our findings suggest that IL‐10 plays a protective role against experimental cerebral malaria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00290.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KOSSODO, S., MONSO, C., JUILLARD, P., VELU, T., GOLDMAN, M., & GRAU, G. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
KOSSODO, S.
Venue
Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-08
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
536-540
ISSN
  • 0019-2805 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2567
OpenAlex
W2000697302
Cited by
180
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
IL-10, experimental cerebral malaria, Plasmodium berghei ANKA, interferon-gamma, TNF-α, neuroprotection, host resistance, mouse strain differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Susceptibility, Interferon-gamma, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred CBA, Plasmodium berghei, Recombinant Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Gene Expression, Interleukin-10, Malaria, Cerebral, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review