Sperm morphology analysis using strict criteria as a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of Kruger's criteria for sperm morphology on intrauterine insemination (IUI) outcome. A total of 209 infertile patients underwent 244 IUI treatment cycles. These include 75 couples (80 cycles) with teratozoospermia and 134 couples (164 cycles) with unexplained infertility. The pregnancy rates per IUI cycle were 3.8 (1/26), 18.5 (10/54) and 29.9% (49/164) in patients with sperm morphology with <4, 4-9 and >9% normal forms, respectively, according to Kruger's criteria. A statistical difference in outcome was seen between couples with <4 and >9% normal forms (p = 0.005). Although the difference in pregnancy rates between those with 4-9 and <4% normal forms was not statistically significant, the pregnancy rate for those with 4-9% normal forms was acceptable and still higher than in those with <4% normal forms. Therefore, we suggest that IUI is a reasonable first-line therapy for patients with sperm morphology >4% normal forms, while couples with <4% normal forms should be advised to use in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection instead of IUI.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lee et al. found significantly different pregnancy outcomes after IUI between couples with <4% and >9% normal forms.
“In a study on the impact of impaired morphology on intrauterine insemination (IUI) outcomes Lee et al., found significantly different pregnancy outcomes after IUI between couples with <4% and >9% normal forms (84).”
From Isolated teratozoospermia: revisiting its relevance in male infertility: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
Other smaller studies observed that sperm morphology affected the outcome of IUI.
“Other studies of smaller series also observed that sperm morphology affected the outcome of IUI [86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93].”
From Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group (2026) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Matorras, R., Corcóstegui, B., Perez, C., Mandiola, M., Mendoza, R., & Rodríguez-Escudero, F. J. (1995) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57434-2 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Hauser, R., Yogev, L., Botchan, A., Lessing, J. B., Paz, G., & Yavetz, H. (2001) · Andrologia · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0272.2001.00404.x · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Leu, G. Z., Lee, R. K. K., Su, J. T., Chen, Y. U. & Chien, Y. C. (1995) Using sperm morphology with Kruger's criteria for indication of micromanipulation in IVF program. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility 4, 42-47.
- Lindheim, S. R., Barad, D. H., Zinger, M., Witt, B., Amin, H., Cohen, B., Fisch, H. & Barg, P. (1996) Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 13, 569-572.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Isolated abnormal strict morphology is not a contraindication for intrauterine insemination
Lockwood, G. M., Deveneau, N. E., Shridharani, A. N., Strawn, E. Y., & Sandlow, J. I. (2015) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12098 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Isolated teratozoospermia: revisiting its relevance in male infertility: a narrative review
Atmoko, W., Savira, M., Shah, R., Chung, E., & Agarwal, A. (2024) · Translational Andrology and Urology · doi:10.21037/tau-23-397 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“In a study on the impact of impaired morphology on intrauterine insemination (IUI) outcomes Lee et al. , found significantly different pregnancy outcomes after IUI between couples with <4% and >9% normal forms (84).”
Gatimel, N., Barbotin, A., Mery, L., Beauvillard, D., Bendayan, M., Boursier, A., Boueilh, T., Pereira, B., Chammas, J., Jacquet, J., et al. (2026) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.70134 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lee, R. K., Hou, J., Ho, H., Hwu, Y., Lin, M., Tsai, Y., & Su, J.
- Affiliations
- Mackay Memorial Hospital (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Robert Kuo‐Kuang
- ORCID
- Tsai, Yi‐Chun
- Venue
- International Journal of Andrology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09-19
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 277-280
- ISSN
- 0105-6263 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2605
- OpenAlex
- W2004943137
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Andrology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Keywords
- sperm morphology, intrauterine insemination, teratozoospermia, unexplained infertility, pregnancy rate, prognostic factors, male infertility
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Insemination, Artificial, Male, Pregnancy, Prognosis, Spermatozoa, Uterus, Pregnancy Rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review