The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of an instrument to measure collaboration and satisfaction about care decisions
Abstract
The psychometric assessment of a new instrument for measurement of the construct of nurse‐physician collaboration in making specific patient care decisions, Collaboration and Satisfaction About Care Decisions (CSACD), is reported Content validity for the tool was supported by literature review, nurse and physician experts, and potential subjects In a pilot study 58 neonatal intensive care nurses’and resident physicians’responses showed variance, alpha reliability of the collaboration questions was 0 95 Construct validity of the collaboration questions was supported by finding expected correlational patterns and by factor analysis revealing a single factor that explained 75% of the variance in collaboration Further psychometric testing of the instrument is proposed, particularly in the context of substantive studies that would allow investigation of its association with patient outcomes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advanced Design in Nursing Research
Brink, P., & Wood, M. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781452204840 · Cited by 433
Cited by
The determinants of successful collaboration: A review of theoretical and empirical studies
San Martín-Rodríguez, L., Beaulieu, M.-D., D'Amour, D., & Ferrada-Videla, M. (2005) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820500082677 · Cited by 815
Association between nurse-physician collaboration and patient outcomes in three intensive care units
Baggs, J. G., Schmitt, M. H., Mushlin, A. I., Mitchell, P. H., Eldredge, D. H., Oakes, D., & Hutson, A. D. (1999) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199909000-00045 · Cited by 654
Doctors’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethical problems in end‐of‐life decisions
Oberle, K., & Hughes, D. (2001) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01710.x · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Gedney, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 176-182
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W1984339753
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of an instrument to measure collaboration and satisfaction about care decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010176.x
- The paper
- Gedney, J. (1994). Development of an instrument to measure collaboration and satisfaction about care decisions. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010176.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
