Cited by 815Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationTeam Dynamics and Performance

The determinants of successful collaboration: A review of theoretical and empirical studies

San Martín-Rodríguez, Leticia, Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique, D'Amour, Danielle, Ferrada-Videla, Marcela·2005·Journal of Interprofessional Care

Abstract

Successful collaboration in health care teams can be attributed to numerous elements, including processes at work in interpersonal relationships within the team (the interactional determinants), conditions within the organization (the organizational determinants), and the organization's environment (the systemic determinants). Through a review of the literature, this article presents a tabulated compilation of each of these determinant types as identified by empirical research and identifies the main characteristics of these determinants according to the conceptual work. We then present a "showcase" of recent Canadian policy initiatives--The Canadian Health Transition Fund (HTF)--to illustrate how the various categories of determinants can be mobilized. The literature review reveals that very little of the empirical work has dealt with determinants of interprofessional collaboration in health, particularly its organizational and systemic determinants. Furthermore, our overview of experience at the Canadian HTF suggests that a systemic approach should be adopted in evaluative research on the determinants of effective collaborative practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13561820500082677

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
San Martín-Rodríguez, L., Beaulieu, M.-D., D'Amour, D., & Ferrada-Videla, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Published
2005-05
Volume
19
Issue
sup1
Pages
132-147
ISSN
  • 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9567
OpenAlex
W2120183374
Cited by
815
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 46
FWCI
20.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interprofessional Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
interprofessional collaboration, healthcare teams, determinants of cooperation, organizational factors, interpersonal relationships, health policy
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Models, Theoretical, Patient Care Team, Quebec, Empirical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review