The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing the level of student reflection from reflective journals
Open accessAbstract
The concept of reflective learning has been widely adopted in many of the nursing curricula today Reflective learning is of particular relevance to the education of professionals, as it encourages students to integrate theory with practice, appreciate the world on their own behalf, and turn every experience into a new potential learning experience While nurse educators have widely accepted the educational benefits of reflection, research into reflective learning is hampered by the lack of reliable and widely accepted methods for assessing whether reflection takes place and the level of any reflection This study attempted to develop and test coding systems for written reflective journals based on two well‐known models of reflective thinking The reflective journals submitted by the students were subjected to content analysis at two levels The findings of this study suggest that student writing can be used as evidence for the presence or absence of reflective thinking The process of allocating students to three categories of non‐reflector, reflector and critical reflector was straightforward and reliable Identifying textual elements within journals and allocating them to the finer levels of reflection within a more complex model of reflective thinking was, however, more problematic and considerably less reliable
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review
Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2 · Cited by 2,175
Development of a Questionnaire to Measure the Level of Reflective Thinking
Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Yuet Wong, F. K., Wong, M., et al. (2000) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/713611442 · Cited by 812
Self-citationA four‐category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work
Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., & Wong, F. K. Y. (2008) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930701293355 · Cited by 444
Self-citationKuiper, R. A., & Pesut, D. J. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02921.x · Cited by 405
KEMBER, D. (1999) · International Journal of Lifelong Education · doi:10.1080/026013799293928 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, F. K., Kember, D., Chung, L. Y. F., & CertEd, L. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-57
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W1973804463
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the level of student reflection from reflective journals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010048.x
- The paper
- Wong, F. K., Kember, D., Chung, L. Y. F., & CertEd, L. Y. (1995). Assessing the level of student reflection from reflective journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010048.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.