The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predictors of job satisfaction and absenteeism in two samples of Hong Kong nurses*
Open accessAbstract
Background. Stress‐related outcomes of job satisfaction and absenteeism among nurses should receive more attention in Hong Kong because absenteeism is costly. Many nurses' complaints are due to organizational change in privatization since the establishment of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority in 1991. Organizational climate is found to be an antecedent of job dissatisfaction and absenteeism in many studies in western societies. Aim. To investigate the role of organizational climate and psychological distress on job satisfaction; and the role of climate, distress and job satisfaction on absenteeism in Hong Kong nurses, while controlling for demographic variables. Methods. A self‐administered questionnaire survey method was used to collect data from two samples of nurses within a 8‐month period. They are, respectively, 144 (74 general nurses, 70 psychiatric nurses; 47 males, 97 females) and 114 (85 general nurses, 29 psychiatric nurses; 17 males, 97 females) nurses. Results. Multiple regression analyses revealed that occupational type (psychiatric/general), environment (the physical conditions in the work area) and psychological distress were significant predictors of job satisfaction for sample 1; and well‐being (social relations, welfare and health issues) was the only significant predictor of job satisfaction for sample 2. However, age, involvement (the degree of commitment displayed towards employees by the organization), psychological distress and job satisfaction were significant predictors of absenteeism for sample 1; and occupational type, organization (the interaction between the worker and the organization), and involvement were significant predictors of absenteeism for sample 2. Conclusions. The empirical findings provide support for the climate–job satisfaction and climate–absenteeism relationships. Psychological distress could be an antecedent of job satisfaction; and job satisfaction could be an antecedent of absenteeism. Certain climate dimensions should be improved to enhance job satisfaction and reduce distress, which in turn will reduce absenteeism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392 · Cited by 1,224
Job satisfaction among nurses: a literature review
Lu, H., While, A. E., & Louise Barriball, K. (2005) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.003 · Cited by 849
Marjanovic, Z., Greenglass, E. R., & Coffey, S. (2007) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.012 · Cited by 372
Work strain, health, and absenteeism: A meta-analysis.
Darr, W., & Johns, G. (2008) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012639 · Cited by 376
Pillay, R. (2009) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/1478-4491-7-15 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Siu, O.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 218-229
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2063081196
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of job satisfaction and absenteeism in two samples of Hong Kong nurses*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02364.x
- The paper
- Siu, O. (2002). Predictors of job satisfaction and absenteeism in two samples of Hong Kong nurses*. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02364.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.