The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Work satisfaction of professional nurses in South Africa: a comparative analysis of the public and private sectors
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Work satisfaction of nurses is important, as there is sufficient empirical evidence to show that it tends to affect individual, organizational and greater health and social outcomes. Although there have been several studies of job satisfaction among nurses in South Africa, these are limited because they relate to studies of individual organizations or regions, use small samples or are dated. This paper presents a national study that compares and contrasts satisfaction levels of nurses in both public and private sectors. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of professional nurses conducted throughout South Africa using a pretested and self-administered questionnaire. Univariate and bivariate statistical models were used to evaluate levels of satisfaction with various facets of work and to elicit the differences in satisfaction levels between different groups of nurses. A total of 569 professional nurses participated in the study. RESULTS: Private-sector nurses were generally satisfied, while public-sector nurses were generally dissatisfied. Public-sector nurses were most dissatisfied with their pay, the workload and the resources available to them. They were satisfied only with the social context of the work. Private-sector nurses were dissatisfied only with their pay and career development opportunities. Professional nurses in the more rural provinces, those intending to change sectors and those more likely not to be in their current positions within the next five years were also more likely to be dissatisfied with all facets of their work. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the overall dissatisfaction among South African nurses and confirmed the disparity between the levels of job satisfaction between the public and private sectors. Health managers should address those factors that affect job satisfaction, and therefore retention, of nurses in South Africa. Improving the work environment so that it provides a context congruent with the aspirations and values systems of nurses is more likely to increase the satisfaction of nurses and consequently have a positive effect on individual, organizational and health outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J., Gurdon, M., Jick, T., Petit, A., Stern, R., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,945
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
The nature and causes of job satisfaction
Locke, E. A. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,819
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,339
Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences
Spector, P. (1997) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452231549 · Cited by 4,915
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2000) · Nursing Older People · doi:10.7748/nop.11.10.26.s15 · Cited by 1,932
Nurses’ Reports On Hospital Care In Five Countries
Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Sochalski, J. A., Busse, R., Clarke, H., Giovannetti, P., Hunt, J., Rafferty, A. M., & Shamian, J. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.43 · Cited by 1,623
Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing
(2020) · Australian journal of advanced nursing · doi:10.37464/2020 · Cited by 1,596
Coomber, B., & Louise Barriball, K. (2007) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.004 · Cited by 934
Cited by
Work Related Stress, Burnout, Job Satisfaction and General Health of Nurses
Khamisa, N., Oldenburg, B., Peltzer, K., & Ilic, D. (2015) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph120100652 · Cited by 828
KLOPPER, H. C., COETZEE, S. K., PRETORIUS, R., & BESTER, P. (2012) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01350.x · Cited by 173
Rouleau, D., Fournier, P., Philibert, A., Mbengue, B., & Dumont, A. (2012) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/1478-4491-10-9 · Cited by 154
Zeffane, R., & Bani Melhem, S. J. (2017) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-06-2017-0135 · Cited by 142
Job satisfaction and retention of midwives in rural Nigeria
Adegoke, A. A., Atiyaye, F. B., Abubakar, A. S., Auta, A., & Aboda, A. (2015) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.010 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Pillay, R.
- Venue
- Human Resources for Health
- Published
- 2009-02-20
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-15
- ISSN
- 1478-4491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017098773
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 46.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Work satisfaction of professional nurses in South Africa: a comparative analysis of the public and private sectors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1478-4491-7-15
- The paper
- Pillay, R. (2009). Work satisfaction of professional nurses in South Africa: a comparative analysis of the public and private sectors. Human Resources for Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-7-15
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.