The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food web
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. A food web is presented which describes trophic interactions among the herbivores, parasitoids, predators and pathogens associated with broom, Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link. The data come from published work on the community at a single site. The web comprises a total of 154 taxa: one plant, 19 herbivores, 66 parasitoids, 60 predators, five omnivores and three pathogens. There are 370 trophic links between these taxa in the web. The taxa form 82 functionally distinct groups, called trophic species. 2. Predators consumed significantly more species than did parasitoids: a median of two prey species per species of predator (range = 1–9), compared to a median of one host species per species of parasitoid (range = 1–4). Significant differences in the number of species consumed were also found among the five predator groups: birds (median = 4), spiders (median = 5), Coleoptera (median = 1), Diptera (median = 2) and Hemiptera (median = 7). 3. Vulnerability, measured by numbers of consumer species, was significantly affected by the herbivores’ feeding styles: externally feeding herbivores were most vulnerable and the concealed herbivores were least vulnerable. Miners were vulnerable to the most parasitoid species and externally feeding herbivores were the most vulnerable to predators. 4. Resource species had a median vulnerability of 13 consumer species, a figure far higher than that in most published food webs. No significant relationship was found between species’ vulnerability to predators and vulnerability to parasitoids. However, there was a strong negative relationship between the percentage mortality due to predation and percentage mortality due to parasitism. 5. The broom food web contains nine orders of insects, a figure higher than previously recorded. The web also contains vertebrates, arachnids, bacteria and fungi. Most of the interactions between the orders were weak. Connectance was calculated for the complete web, the parasitoid sub‐web and the predator sub‐web. The connectance of the predator sub‐web, a value of 0·0364, was more than an order of magnitude larger than the connectance of the entire web (0·0156) or the parasitoid sub‐web (0·018). 6. The body lengths of 52 species in the food web were estimated from field guides or museum specimens. Larger predators consumed smaller prey in 93% of predator–prey interactions. Smaller parasitoids consumed larger hosts in 79% of parasitoid–host interactions. Parasitoids were significantly smaller than predators. 7. The 52 species were arranged in order of increasing body length along the columns and down the rows of a food web matrix. The predator sub‐web was predominantly upper triangular with 8% of non‐zero elements falling below the leading diagonal. The parasitoid sub‐web was predominantly lower triangular with 21% non‐zero elements falling above the leading diagonal. The entire web contains entries both above and below the main diagonal and thus violates a central assumption of the cascade model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE EVOLUTION OF ECOLOGICAL SPECIALIZATION
Futuyma, D. J., & Moreno, G. (1988) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.001231 · Cited by 2,287
Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature.
McCann, K., Hastings, A., & Huxel, G. R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/27427 · Cited by 1,657
Insects on Plants: Community Patterns and Mechanisms
Strong, D. R., Lawton, J. H., & Southwood, S. R. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,600
The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation.
Mills, L. S., & Doak, D. F. (1993) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1312122 · Cited by 1,306
Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders and Related Invertebrates
Harrington, R., Slansky, F., & Rodriguez, J. G. (1988) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4788 · Cited by 920
Food web patterns and their consequences
Pimm, S. L., Lawton, J. H., & Cohen, J. E. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/350669a0 · Cited by 817
Self-citationBody Sizes of Animal Predators and Animal Prey in Food Webs
Cohen, J. E., Pimm, S. L., Yodzis, P., & Saldana, J. (1993) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5483 · Cited by 807
Self-citationImmunological Basis for Compatibility in Parasitoid-Host Relationships
Strand, M. R., & Pech, L. L. (1995) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.000335 · Cited by 784
Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength
Paine, R. T. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/355073a0 · Cited by 735
Artifacts or Attributes? Effects of Resolution on the Little Rock Lake Food Web
Martinez, N. D. (1991) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937047 · Cited by 696
Self-citation
Cited by
The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks
Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J., & Olesen, J. M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1633576100 · Cited by 2,497
Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size
Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J., & Martinez, N. D. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.192407699 · Cited by 1,519
Self-citationParasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links
Lafferty, K. D., Allesina, S., Arim, M., Briggs, C. J., De Leo, G., Dobson, A. P., Dunne, J. A., Johnson, P. T. J., Kuris, A. M., Marcogliese, D. J., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01174.x · Cited by 1,015
Self-citationReview: Ecological networks – beyond food webs
Ings, T. C., Montoya, J. M., Bascompte, J., Blüthgen, N., Brown, L., Dormann, C. F., Edwards, F., Figueroa, D., Jacob, U., Jones, J. I., et al. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01460.x · Cited by 934
Complexity and fragility in ecological networks
Solé, R. V., & Montoya, M. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1767 · Cited by 799
Metadata
- Authors
- Memmott, J., Martinez, N. D., & Cohen, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2106473046
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 23.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food web. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00367.x
- The paper
- Memmott, J., Martinez, N. D., & Cohen, J. E. (2000). Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food web. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00367.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.