Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Climatic effects on breeding and morphology: evidence for phenotypic plasticity

Open access
Przybylo, Robert, Sheldon, BeN C., Merilä, JuhA·2000·Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Summary: 1. A trend towards increasing average spring temperatures has been observed in Europe over the past 25 years. This climatic variation has been attributed to a natural, large‐scale atmospheric phenomenon, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). A number of studies have reported associations between the winter NAO‐index and both breeding phenology and cohort‐specific morphology. These studies have been cross‐sectional rather than longitudinal and therefore have not been able to determine whether the changes result from phenotypic plasticity or microevolutionary processes. 2. We analysed (i) cross‐sectional correlations between the winter NAO‐index and breeding performance (laying date, clutch size, fledging success and number of recruits produced) and morphological traits (tarsus and wing length), and (ii) within‐individual variation in the same traits for individuals experiencing different values of the NAO‐index in a population of collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis) breeding on Gotland, Sweden, over a period of 16 years (1980–95). 3. None of the four measures of breeding performance changed consistently over the study period, while tarsus length of males (and marginally females) decreased over time. Of the six traits investigated using cross‐sectional data, only laying date was related to variation in the NAO‐index. 4. All characters investigated showed significant repeatability within individuals among years, revealing the importance of factors specific to individuals in determining their value. However, within individuals the NAO‐index significantly affected laying date and clutch size such that females laid earlier and produced larger clutches after warmer, moister winters. 5. Our data show a high degree of concordance between cross‐sectional and longitudinal analyses of the effect of NAO on laying date and clutch size. The similarity of responses across and within individuals suggests that the population‐level response to the NAO‐index can be explained entirely as the result of phenotypic plasticity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00401.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Przybylo, R., Sheldon, B. C., & Merilä, J.
Venue
Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-05
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
395-403
ISSN
  • 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2656
OpenAlex
W2046539362
Cited by
314
References
1
FWCI
16.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climatic effects on breeding and morphology: evidence for phenotypic plasticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00401.x
The paper
Przybylo, R., Sheldon, B. C., & Merilä, J. (2000). Climatic effects on breeding and morphology: evidence for phenotypic plasticity. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00401.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.