The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increased risk of predation as a cost of high growth rate: an experimental test in a butterfly
Abstract
Summary: 1. Life history theoreticians have traditionally assumed that juvenile growth rates are maximized and that variation in this trait is due to the quality of the environment. In contrast to this assumption there is a large body of evidence showing that juvenile growth rates may vary adaptively both within and between populations. This adaptive variation implies that high growth rates may be associated with costs. 2. Here, I explicitly evaluate the often‐proposed trade‐off between growth rate and predation risk, in a study of the temperate butterfly, Pararge aegeria (L). 3. By rearing larvae with a common genetic background in different photoperiods it was possible to experimentally manipulate larval growth rates, which vary in response to photoperiod. Predation risk was assessed by exposing larvae that were freely moving on their host plants to the predatory heteropteran, Picromerus bidens (L.). 4. The rate of predation was significantly higher in the fast‐growing larvae. An approximately four times higher relative growth rate was associated with a 30% higher daily predation risk. 5. The main result demonstrates a trade‐off between growth rate and predation risk, and there are reasons to believe that this trade‐off is of general significance in free‐living animals. The results also suggest that juvenile development of P. aegeria is governed by a strategic decision process within individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Longcore, T., & Rich, C. (2004) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0191:elp]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,423
Temperature, Growth Rate, and Body Size in Ectotherms: Fitting Pieces of a Life-History Puzzle
Angilletta, M. J. (2004) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/44.6.498 · Cited by 1,011
The evolution of growth trajectories: what limits growth rate?
Dmitriew, C. M. (2011) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00136.x · Cited by 599
Costs and consequences of evolutionary temperature adaptation
Clarke, A. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.007 · Cited by 468
A scale‐dependent framework for trade‐offs, syndromes, and specialization in organismal biology
Agrawal, A. A. (2020) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.2924 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Gotthard, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 896-902
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2071373881
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased risk of predation as a cost of high growth rate: an experimental test in a butterfly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00432.x
- The paper
- Gotthard, K. (2000). Increased risk of predation as a cost of high growth rate: an experimental test in a butterfly. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00432.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.