Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recovery of tropical rainforest avifauna in relation to vegetation succession following shifting cultivation in Mizoram, north‐east India

Open access
Raman, T.R. Shankar, Rawat, G.S., Johnsingh, A.J.T.·1998·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

1. Recovery of rainforest bird community structure and composition, in relation to forest succession after slash‐and‐burn shifting cultivation or jhum, was studied in Mizoram, north‐east India. Replicate fallow sites abandoned after shifting cultivation 1, 5, 10, 25 and ≈100 years ago, were compared with primary evergreen and semi‐evergreen forest using transect and quadrat sampling. 2. Vegetation variables such as woody plant species richness, tree density and vertical stratification increased with fallow age in a rapid, non‐linear, asymptotic manner. Principal components analysis of vegetation variables summarized 92·8% of the variation into two axes: PC1 reflecting forest development and woody plant succession (variables such as tree density, woody plant species richness), and PC2 depicting bamboo density, which increased from 1 to 25 years and declined thereafter. 3. Bird species richness, abundance and diversity, increased rapidly and asymptotically during succession paralleling vegetation recovery as shown by positive correlations with fallow age and PC1 scores of sites. Bamboo density reflected by PC2 had a negative effect on bird species richness and abundance. 4. The bird community similarity (Morisita index) of sites with primary forest also increased asymptotically with fallow age indicating sequential species turnover during succession. Bird community similarity of sites with primary forest (or between sites) was positively correlated with both physiognomic and floristic similarities with primary forest (or between sites). 5. The number of bird species in guilds associated with forest development and woody plants (canopy insectivores, frugivores, bark feeders) was correlated with PC1 scores of the sites. Species in other guilds (e. g. granivores, understorey insectivores) appeared to dominate during early and mid‐succession. 6. The non‐linear relationships imply that fallow periods less than a threshold of 25 years for birds, and about 50–75 years for woody plants, are likely to cause substantial community alteration. 7. As 5–10‐year rotation periods or jhum cycles prevail in many parts of north‐east India, there is a need to protect and conserve tracts of late‐successional and primary forest.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00297.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Raman, T. R. S., Rawat, G. S., & Johnsingh, A. J. T.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-04
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
214-231
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W1996290151
Cited by
184
References
1
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovery of tropical rainforest avifauna in relation to vegetation succession following shifting cultivation in Mizoram, north‐east India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00297.x
The paper
Raman, T. R. S., Rawat, G. S., & Johnsingh, A. J. T. (1998). Recovery of tropical rainforest avifauna in relation to vegetation succession following shifting cultivation in Mizoram, north‐east India. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00297.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.