The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Post‐burn reproduction of woody plants in a neotropical savanna: the relative importance of sexual and vegetative reproduction
Open accessAbstract
1. Burning typically occurs at intervals of 1–3‐years in the Brazilian cerrado, a rate that exceeds the precolonization fire regime. To determine if woody plants of the cerrado successfully reproduce within the short span of time between burns, experimental burns were used to quantify the effects of fire on sexual and vegetative reproduction of six species of resprouting trees and shrubs. 2.Four of the six species reproduce vegetatively by producing root suckers. For three of these species,Rourea induta,Myrsine guianensis and Roupala montana, sucker production was seven to 15 times greater in burned plots than in unburned controls. 3.Fire had a negative impact on sexual reproduction. Fire caused an immediate reduction in sexual reproductive success by destroying developing reproductive structures and seeds. Additionally, five of the six study species exhibited overall reductions in seed production in the years following fire. Fire had this effect by reducing the individual size of all species and, for three species, by reducing size‐specific reproductive output. Only the tree Piptocarpha rotundifolia exhibited increased seed production following burning. 4.Fire caused substantial mortality to both seedlings and suckers. Suckers were larger than seedlings and experienced lower mortality rates for two of three species. Fire‐induced mortality of seedlings varied greatly among species, ranging from 33% to 100%. 5.The results indicate that vegetative reproduction is much more successful than sexual reproduction under the high fire frequency typical of current fire regimes. It is concluded that current fire regimes must be causing a shift in species composition, favouring species capable of vegetative reproduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fire as a global ‘herbivore’: the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems
BOND, W., & KEELEY, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.025 · Cited by 2,484
Hoffmann, W. A., Geiger, E. L., Gotsch, S. G., Rossatto, D. R., Silva, L. C. R., Lau, O. L., Haridasan, M., & Franco, A. C. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01789.x · Cited by 862
Self-citationLinking plant phenology to conservation biology
Morellato, L. P. C., Alberton, B., Alvarado, S. T., Borges, B., Buisson, E., Camargo, M. G. G., Cancian, L. F., Carstensen, D. W., Escobar, D. F. E., Leite, P. T. P., et al. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.033 · Cited by 423
Effects of fire protection on savanna structure in Central Brazil
Moreira, A. G. (2000) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00422.x · Cited by 353
Soil–vegetation relationships in cerrados under different fire frequencies
da Silva, D. M., & Batalha, M. A. (2008) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9660-y · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffmann, W. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 422-433
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1976800897
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post‐burn reproduction of woody plants in a neotropical savanna: the relative importance of sexual and vegetative reproduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00321.x
- The paper
- Hoffmann, W. A. (1998). Post‐burn reproduction of woody plants in a neotropical savanna: the relative importance of sexual and vegetative reproduction. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00321.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.