Ecological thresholds at the savanna‐forest boundary: how plant traits, resources and fire govern the distribution of tropical biomes
Abstract
Fire shapes the distribution of savanna and forest through complex interactions involving climate, resources and species traits. Based on data from central Brazil, we propose that these interactions are governed by two critical thresholds. The fire‐resistance threshold is reached when individual trees have accumulated sufficient bark to avoid stem death, whereas the fire‐suppression threshold is reached when an ecosystem has sufficient canopy cover to suppress fire by excluding grasses. Surpassing either threshold is dependent upon long fire‐free intervals, which are rare in mesic savanna. On high‐resource sites, the thresholds are reached quickly, increasing the probability that savanna switches to forest, whereas low‐resource sites are likely to remain as savanna even if fire is infrequent. Species traits influence both thresholds; saplings of savanna trees accumulate bark thickness more quickly than forest trees, and are more likely to become fire resistant during fire‐free intervals. Forest trees accumulate leaf area more rapidly than savanna trees, thereby accelerating the transition to forest. Thus, multiple factors interact with fire to determine the distribution of savanna and forest by influencing the time needed to reach these thresholds. Future work should decipher multiple environmental controls over the rates of tree growth and canopy closure in savanna.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positive feedbacks, whereby frequent burning maintains flammable plant communities, can perpetuate grasslands and savannas in regions climatically suitable for forests.
“Positive feedbacks, whereby frequent burning maintains flammable plant communities, can perpetuate grasslands and savannas in regions climatically suitable for forests (Dantas, Batalha, & Pausas, 2013;Harms, Gagnon, Passmore, Myers, & Platt, 2017;Hoffmann et al., 2012).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Hoffmann et al., 2012
Cites
The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire
Bond, W. J., Woodward, F. I., & Midgley, G. F. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01252.x · Cited by 1,942 · see citing works
What Limits Trees in C<sub>4</sub> Grasslands and Savannas?
Bond, W. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173411 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
Large-scale impacts of herbivores on the structural diversity of African savannas
Asner, G. P., Levick, S. R., Kennedy-Bowdoin, T., Knapp, D. E., Emerson, R., Jacobson, J., Colgan, M. S., & Martin, R. E. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0810637106 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
The biodiversity cost of carbon sequestration in tropical savanna
Abreu, R. C. R., Hoffmann, W. A., Vasconcelos, H. L., Pilon, N. A., Rossatto, D. R., & Durigan, G. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701284 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Self-citationFairman, T. A., Nitschke, C. R., & Bennett, L. T. (2016) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf15010 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Fire drives functional thresholds on the savanna–forest transition
de L. Dantas, V., Batalha, M. A., & Pausas, J. G. (2013) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/12-1629.1 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Moncrieff, G. R., Scheiter, S., Bond, W. J., & Higgins, S. I. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12551 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hoffmann, W. A., Geiger, E. L., Gotsch, S. G., Rossatto, D. R., Silva, L. C. R., Lau, O. L., Haridasan, M., & Franco, A. C.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 759-768
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2106565849
- Cited by
- 862
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- ecological thresholds, fire regimes, fire resistance, fire suppression, bark thickness, canopy cover, tree species traits, leaf area, fire-free interval, tropical biomes, Central Brazil, resource availability
- MeSH terms
- Brazil, Fires, Trees, Tropical Climate, Ecosystem, Seedlings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review