The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Abundance–occupancy relationships
Open accessAbstract
1. The abundance and distribution of species tend to be linked, such that species declining in abundance often tend also to show declines in the number of sites they occupy, while species increasing in abundance tend also to be increasing in occupancy. Therefore, intraspecific abundance–occupancy relationships are commonly positive. 2. The intraspecific pattern is mirrored by more general positive interspecific abundance–occupancy relationships: widespread species tend to be abundant, and narrowly distributed species rare. 3. Here, we review recent research on these patterns based on the flora and fauna of the British Isles. We assess their generality, describe what is currently known about their structure, and summarize the results of tests of the several hypotheses proposed to explain their existence. 4. The positive form generally exhibited by abundance–occupancy relationships, intraspecific or interspecific, has consequences for several areas of applied ecology, including conservation, harvesting, biological invasions and biodiversity inventorying. These implications are discussed briefly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Population Diversity: Its Extent and Extinction
Hughes, J. B., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.689 · Cited by 596
Interaction Between Stock Area, Stock Abundance, and Catchability Coefficient
Winters, G. H., & Wheeler, J. P. (1985) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f85-124 · Cited by 126
Holism and Reductionism in Evolutionary Ecology
Wilson, D. S. (1988) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3566073 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis
Thomas, J. A., Telfer, M. G., Roy, D. B., Preston, C. D., Greenwood, J. J. D., Asher, J., Fox, R., Clarke, R. T., & Lawton, J. H. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095046 · Cited by 955
Self-citationCommonness, population depletion and conservation biology
GASTON, K., & FULLER, R. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.001 · Cited by 569
Self-citationThe Role of Mountain Ranges in the Diversification of Birds
Fjeldså, J., Bowie, R. C. K., & Rahbek, C. (2012) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145113 · Cited by 420
Species turnover promotes the importance of bee diversity for crop pollination at regional scales
Winfree, R., Reilly, J. R., Bartomeus, I., Cariveau, D. P., Williams, N. M., & Gibbs, J. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2117 · Cited by 324
Citizens, science and bird conservation
Greenwood, J. J. D. (2007) · Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1007/s10336-007-0239-9 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., Greenwood, J. J. D., Gregory, R. D., Quinn, R. M., & Lawton, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 39-59
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2016822132
- Cited by
- 885
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abundance–occupancy relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00485.x
- The paper
- Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., Greenwood, J. J. D., Gregory, R. D., Quinn, R. M., & Lawton, J. H. (2000). Abundance–occupancy relationships. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00485.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.