The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The verification and application of bioindicators: a case study of dung beetles in a savanna ecosystem
Abstract
Summary: Bioindicators of habitat quality and environmental change must be identified quantitatively and tested independently to confirm their usefulness. We used the indicator value (IndVal) method, which combines measures of habitat fidelity and specificity, to assess the indicator responses of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Tembe Elephant Park, South Africa. The indicator responses were verified by sampling in different areas of the Park, 2 years after the responses were originally quantified. We postulated that terrestrial insect indicators with different combinations of habitat specificity and fidelity might fulfil different indicator roles. Indicator species with strong habitat specificity (characteristic species) are unlikely to provide information on the direction of ecological change despite high vulnerability. Rather, detector species that span a range of ecological states are likely to be better in this role. We used IndVal for selecting such detector species that indicate the direction of ecological change. Sets of species were found to be robust bioindicators, i.e. reliably characteristic across the habitat of which they were indicative. The suite of indicators was refined by discarding those with IndVal s that varied significantly across years, thus improving the confidence in the final suite of species selected. By clearly responding to a change in habitat between two ecological states, detector species provided information complementary to that provided by characteristic species. The IndVal method enabled both the identification and testing of indicator (characteristic and detector) species. Because of its resilience to changes in abundance, IndVal is a particularly effective tool for ecological bioindication. We conclude that both characteristic and detector species are useful bioindicators of habitat quality and conversion. We propose that bioindicators that are categorized and verified in this way will have valuable application in the monitoring of habitat integrity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Cited by
Cascading biodiversity and functional consequences of a global change–induced biome switch
Parr, C. L., Gray, E. F., & Bond, W. J. (2012) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00882.x · Cited by 126
The pyrodiversity–biodiversity hypothesis: a test with savanna termite assemblages
Davies, A. B., Eggleton, P., van Rensburg, B. J., & Parr, C. L. (2012) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02107.x · Cited by 106
Son, D., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2020) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00154-2 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- McGeoch, M. A., Van Rensburg, B. J., & Botes, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 661-672
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1549875095
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The verification and application of bioindicators: a case study of dung beetles in a savanna ecosystem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00743.x
- The paper
- McGeoch, M. A., Van Rensburg, B. J., & Botes, A. (2002). The verification and application of bioindicators: a case study of dung beetles in a savanna ecosystem. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00743.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.