The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resistant starch modifies gut microflora and microbial metabolism in human flora-associated rats inoculated with faeces from Italian and UK donors
Abstract
The effect of sucrose and resistant starch ('CrystaLean'--a retrograded, amylose starch) on human gut microflora and associated parameters was studied in human flora-associated (HFA) rats, colonized with microfloras from UK or Italian subjects, to determine whether such floras were affected differently by dietary carbohydrates. Consumption of the resistant starch diet resulted in significant changes in four of the seven main groups of bacteria enumerated. In both the UK and Italian flora-associated rats, numbers of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria were increased 10-100-fold, and there was a concomitant decrease in enterobacteria when compared with sucrose-fed rats. The induced changes in caecal microflora of both HFA rat groups were reflected in changes in bacterial enzyme activities and caecal ammonia concentration. Although it had little effect on caecal short-chain fatty acid concentration, CrystaLean markedly increased the proportion of n-butyric acid in both rat groups and was associated with a significant increase in cell proliferation in the proximal colon of the Italian flora-associated rats. CrystaLean appeared to play a protective role in the colon environment, lowering caecal ammonia concentration, caecal pH and beta-glucuronidase activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Health properties of resistant starch
Nugent, A. P. (2005) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/j.1467-3010.2005.00481.x · Cited by 715
Martínez, I., Kim, J., Duffy, P. R., Schlegel, V. L., & Walter, J. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015046 · Cited by 645
Review article: dietary fibre-microbiota interactions
Simpson, H. L., & Campbell, B. J. (2015) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.13248 · Cited by 602
Hodgkinson, K., El Abbar, F., Dobranowski, P., Manoogian, J., Butcher, J., Figeys, D., Mack, D., & Stintzi, A. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.10.024 · Cited by 423
Prebiotics and synbiotics: towards the next generation
Rastall, R. A., & Maitin, V. (2002) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(02)00365-8 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Silvi, S., Rumney, C. J., Cresci, A., & Rowland, I. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 521-530
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W2017809653
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistant starch modifies gut microflora and microbial metabolism in human flora-associated rats inoculated with faeces from Italian and UK donors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00696.x
- The paper
- Silvi, S., Rumney, C. J., Cresci, A., & Rowland, I. R. (1999). Resistant starch modifies gut microflora and microbial metabolism in human flora-associated rats inoculated with faeces from Italian and UK donors. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00696.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.