The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The sensitivity to honey of Gram-positive cocci of clinical significance isolated from wounds
Abstract
AIMS: To determine the sensitivity to honey of Gram-positive cocci of clinical significance in wounds and demonstrate that inhibition is not exclusively due to osmotic effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighteen strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and seven strains of vancomycin-sensitive enterococci were isolated from infected wounds and 20 strains of vancomycin-resistant enterococci were isolated from hospital environmental surfaces. Using an agar incorporation technique to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), their sensitivity to two natural honeys of median levels of antibacterial activity was established and compared with an artificial honey solution. For all of the strains tested, the MIC values against manuka and pasture honey were below 10% (v/v), but concentrations of artificial honey at least three times higher were required to achieve equivalent inhibition in vitro. Comparison of the MIC values of antibiotic-sensitive strains with their respective antibiotic-resistant strains demonstrated no marked differences in their susceptibilities to honey. CONCLUSIONS: The inhibition of bacteria by honey is not exclusively due to osmolarity. For the Gram-positive cocci tested, antibiotic-sensitive and -resistant strains showed similar sensitivity to honey. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: A possible role for honey in the treatment of wounds colonized by antibiotic-resistant bacteria is indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Honey: its medicinal property and antibacterial activity
Mandal, M. D., & Mandal, S. (2011) · Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/s2221-1691(11)60016-6 · Cited by 893
The Evidence Supporting the Use of Honey as a Wound Dressing
Molan, P. C. (2006) · The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds · doi:10.1177/1534734605286014 · Cited by 441
Self-citationAntimicrobial and healing activity of kefir and kefiran extract
Rodrigues, K. L., Caputo, L. R. G., Carvalho, J. C. T., Evangelista, J., & Schneedorf, J. M. (2005) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.09.020 · Cited by 380
Honey for Wound Healing, Ulcers, and Burns; Data Supporting Its Use in Clinical Practice
Al-Waili, N., Salom, K., & Al-Ghamdi, A. A. (2011) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2011.78 · Cited by 314
Johnson, D. W., van Eps, C., Mudge, D. W., Wiggins, K. J., Armstrong, K., Hawley, C. M., Campbell, S. B., Isbel, N. M., Nimmo, G. R., & Gibbs, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2004110997 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, R. A., Molan, P. C., & Harding, K. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 857-863
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W2146664815
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sensitivity to honey of Gram-positive cocci of clinical significance isolated from wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01761.x
- The paper
- Cooper, R. A., Molan, P. C., & Harding, K. G. (2002). The sensitivity to honey of Gram-positive cocci of clinical significance isolated from wounds. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01761.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.