CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 530Antimicrobial agents and applicationsEssential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Activity and mechanisms of action of selected biocidal agents on Gram-positive and-negative bacteria

Walsh, S.E., Maillard, J.-Y., Russell, A.D., Catrenich, C.E., Charbonneau, D.L., Bartolo, R.G.·2003·Journal of Applied Microbiology
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01825.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

AIMS: This study investigates the antimicrobial activity and mode of action of two natural products, eugenol and thymol, a commonly utilized biostatic agent, triclocarban (TCC), and two surfactants, didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDDMAC) and C10-C16 alkyldimethyl amine N-oxides (ADMAO). METHODS AND RESULTS: Methods used included: determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), lethal effect studies with suspension tests and the investigation of sub-MIC concentrations on growth of E. coli, Staph. aureus and Ps. aeruginosa using a Bioscreen microbiological analyser. Leakage of intracellular constituents and the effects of potentiating agents were also investigated. Only DDDMAC was bactericidal against all of the organisms tested. Eugenol, thymol and ADMAO showed bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity, but not against Ps. aeruginosa. TCC was only bacteristatic against Staph. aureus, but like the other agents, it did affect the growth of the other organisms in the Bioscreen experiments. All of the antimicrobial agents tested were potentiated by the permeabilizers to some extent and leakage of potassium was seen with all of the agents except TCC. CONCLUSIONS: DDDMAC was bactericidal against all organisms tested and all compounds had some bacteriostatic action. Low level static effects on bacterial growth were seen with sub-MIC concentrations. Membrane damage may account for at least part of the mode of action of thymol, eugenol, DDDMAC and ADMAO. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The ingredients evaluated demonstrated a range of bactericidal and bacteriostatic properties against the Gram-negative and -positive organisms evaluated and the membrane (leakage of intracellular components) was implicated in the mode of action for most (except TCC). Sub-MIC levels of all ingredients did induce subtle effects on the organisms which impacted bacterial growth, even for those which had no true inhibitory effects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01825.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Breneman D.L., 2000, Cutis; Cutaneous Medicine for the Practitioner, 66, 296
  2. 10.1016/S0378-1097(99)00289-X · DOI
  3. Mansour S.A., 2000, Journal of Natural Toxins, 9, 49
  4. Morrel, 1995, Forest Products Journal, 45, 84

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 530

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Walsh, S. E., Maillard, J.-Y., Russell, A. D., Catrenich, C. E., Charbonneau, D. L., & Bartolo, R. G.
Affiliations
  • De Montfort University (GB)
  • University of Brighton (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2003-02
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
240-247
ISSN
  • 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2672
DOI
10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01825.x
OpenAlex
W1969348764
Cited by
527
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 26
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 4595 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antimicrobial agents and applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
eugenol, thymol, triclocarban, didecyldimethylammonium chloride, antimicrobial activity, mechanism of action, bactericides, bacteriostatic agents, membrane damage, potassium leakage, sub-MIC effects, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, surfactants, natural products
MeSH terms
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Carbanilides, Edetic Acid, Escherichia coli, Eugenol, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Potassium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Sesquiterpenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Surface-Active Agents, Thymol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review