The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Novel antiviral agents: a medicinal plant perspective
Abstract
Several hundred plant and herb species that have potential as novel antiviral agents have been studied, with surprisingly little overlap. A wide variety of active phytochemicals, including the flavonoids, terpenoids, lignans, sulphides, polyphenolics, coumarins, saponins, furyl compounds, alkaloids, polyines, thiophenes, proteins and peptides have been identified. Some volatile essential oils of commonly used culinary herbs, spices and herbal teas have also exhibited a high level of antiviral activity. However, given the few classes of compounds investigated, most of the pharmacopoeia of compounds in medicinal plants with antiviral activity is still not known. Several of these phytochemicals have complementary and overlapping mechanisms of action, including antiviral effects by either inhibiting the formation of viral DNA or RNA or inhibiting the activity of viral reproduction. Assay methods to determine antiviral activity include multiple-arm trials, randomized crossover studies, and more compromised designs such as nonrandomized crossovers and pre- and post-treatment analyses. Methods are needed to link antiviral efficacy/potency- and laboratory-based research. Nevertheless, the relative success achieved recently using medicinal plant/herb extracts of various species that are capable of acting therapeutically in various viral infections has raised optimism about the future of phyto-antiviral agents. As this review illustrates, there are innumerable potentially useful medicinal plants and herbs waiting to be evaluated and exploited for therapeutic applications against genetically and functionally diverse viruses families such as Retroviridae, Hepadnaviridae and Herpesviridae
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biological effects of essential oils—A review
Bakkali, F., Averbeck, S., Averbeck, D., & Idaomar, M. (2008) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106 · Cited by 7,929
Essential Oils, A New Horizon in Combating Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance
Yap, P. S. X., Yiap, B. C., Ping, H. C., & Lim, S. H. E. (2014) · The Open Microbiology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874285801408010006 · Cited by 426
Ezzat Abd El-Hack, M., Alagawany, M., Ragab Farag, M., Tiwari, R., Karthik, K., Dhama, K., Zorriehzahra, J., & Adel, M. (2016) · Journal of Essential Oil Research · doi:10.1080/10412905.2016.1153002 · Cited by 166
Discovery of a new class of antiviral compounds: camphor imine derivatives
Sokolova, A. S., Yarovaya, O. I., Shernyukov, A. V., Gatilov, Y. V., Razumova, Y. V., Zarubaev, V. V., Tretiak, T. S., Pokrovsky, A. G., Kiselev, O. I., & Salakhutdinov, N. F. (2015) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.10.010 · Cited by 101
Camphor-based symmetric diimines as inhibitors of influenza virus reproduction
Sokolova, A. S., Yarovaya, О. I., Korchagina, D. V., Zarubaev, V. V., Tretiak, T. S., Anfimov, P. M., Kiselev, O. I., & Salakhutdinov, N. F. (2014) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2014.02.038 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Jassim, S. A. A., & Naji, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 412-427
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W2065883537
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel antiviral agents: a medicinal plant perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02026.x
- The paper
- Jassim, S. A. A., & Naji, M. A. (2003). Novel antiviral agents: a medicinal plant perspective. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02026.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.