The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The paradox of invasion
Abstract
It is paradoxical that exotic species invade and displace native species that are well adapted to local environments. Yet, even those exotics that eventually become abundant and widespread, often do so only after having failed to establish following multiple earlier introductions. The first pattern, while not generally discussed in this context, is usually explained by exotic species pre‐adaptations for human‐altered environments and by a release from enemies. It can be understood further by examining the superior quality of colonists from large species‐rich regions and the historical contingency of evolution. The second pattern is generally explained by invoking demographic and environmental stochasticity; however, it can be understood further by examining the role of environmental variation over space and by metapopulation dynamics. These processes provide a context in which these patterns of invasion are not paradoxical, but instead, expected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change
D'Antonio, C. M., & Vitousek, P. M. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000431 · Cited by 3,399
THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE DEGRADATION OF ISLAND ECOSYSTEMS: A Case History of Guam
Fritts, T. H., & Rodda, G. H. (1998) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.113 · Cited by 601
Cited by
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities
Walther, G.-R., Roques, A., Hulme, P. E., Sykes, M. T., Pyšek, P., Kühn, I., Zobel, M., Bacher, S., Botta-Dukát, Z., & Bugmann, H. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.008 · Cited by 1,424
Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses
GIENAPP, P., TEPLITSKY, C., ALHO, J. S., MILLS, J. A., & MERILÄ, J. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03413.x · Cited by 1,256
Jackson, S. T., & Sax, D. F. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.001 · Cited by 717
Self-citationBehavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds
Sol, D., Timmermans, S., & Lefebvre, L. (2002) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1953 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Sax, D. F., & Brown, J. H.
- Venue
- Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 363-371
- ISSN
- 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-8238
- OpenAlex
- W2037783725
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The paradox of invasion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00217.x
- The paper
- Sax, D. F., & Brown, J. H. (2000). The paradox of invasion. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00217.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.