The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictors of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Abstract
Aim and Location: We assessed the effects of biophysical and anthropogenic predictors on deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia. This region has the world's highest absolute rates of forest destruction and fragmentation. Methods: Using a GIS, spatial data coverages were developed for deforestation and for three types of potential predictors: (1) human‐demographic factors (rural‐population density, urban‐population size); (2) factors that affect physical accessibility to forests (linear distances to the nearest paved highway, unpaved road and navigable river), and (3) factors that may affect land‐use suitability for human occupation and agriculture (annual rainfall, dry‐season severity, soil fertility, soil waterlogging, soil depth). To reduce the effects of spatial autocorrelation among variables, the basin was subdivided into >1900 quadrats of 50 × 50 km, and a random subset of 120 quadrats was selected that was stratified on deforestation intensity. A robust ordination analysis (non‐metric multidimensional scaling) was then used to identify key orthogonal gradients among the ten original predictor variables. Results: The ordination revealed two major environmental gradients in the study area. Axis 1 discriminated among areas with relatively dense human populations and highways, and areas with sparse populations and no highways; whereas axis 2 described a gradient between wet sites having low dry‐season severity, many navigable rivers and few roads, and those with opposite values. A multiple regression analysis revealed that both factors were highly significant predictors, collectively explaining nearly 60% of the total variation in deforestation intensity (F2,117=85.46, P < 0.0001). Simple correlations of the original variables were highly concordant with the multiple regression model and suggested that highway density and rural‐population size were the most important correlates of deforestation. Mainconclusions: These trends suggest that deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon is being largely determined by three proximate factors: human population density, highways and dry‐season severity, all of which increase deforestation. At least at the spatial scale of this analysis, soil fertility and waterlogging had little influence on deforestation activity, and soil depth was only marginally significant. Our findings suggest that current policy initiatives designed to increase immigration and dramatically expand highway and infrastructure networks in the Brazilian Amazon are likely to have important impacts on deforestation activity. Deforestation will be greatest in relatively seasonal, south‐easterly areas of the basin, which are most accessible to major population centres and where large‐scale cattle ranching and slash‐and‐burn farming are most easily implemented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tropical Deforestation and Habitat Fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite Data from 1978 to 1988
Skole, D., & Tucker, C. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.260.5116.1905 · Cited by 1,590
Road paving, fire regime feedbacks, and the future of Amazon forests
Nepstad, D., Carvalho, G., Cristina Barros, A., Alencar, A., Paulo Capobianco, J., Bishop, J., Moutinho, P., Lefebvre, P., Lopes Silva, U., & Prins, E. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00511-4 · Cited by 712
Rainforest fragmentation kills big trees
Laurance, W. F., Delamônica, P., Laurance, S. G., Vasconcelos, H. L., & Lovejoy, T. E. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35009032 · Cited by 676
Self-citation
Cited by
The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability
Turner, B. L., Lambin, E. F., & Reenberg, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704119104 · Cited by 2,216
Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature
Laurance, W. F., Sayer, J., & Cassman, K. G. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.12.001 · Cited by 1,522
Self-citationImpacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests
Laurance, W. F., Goosem, M., & Laurance, S. G. W. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.009 · Cited by 1,243
Self-citationRoads, deforestation, and the mitigating effect of protected areas in the Amazon
Barber, C. P., Cochrane, M. A., Souza, C. M., & Laurance, W. F. (2014) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.004 · Cited by 667
Self-citationWhat Drives Deforestation and What Stops It? A Meta-Analysis
Busch, J., & Ferretti-Gallon, K. (2017) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/rew013 · Cited by 535
Metadata
- Authors
- Laurance, W. F., Albernaz, A. K. M., Schroth, G., Fearnside, P. M., Bergen, S., Venticinque, E. M., & Da Costa, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 737-748
- ISSN
- 0305-0270 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2699
- OpenAlex
- W2058521008
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00721.x
- The paper
- Laurance, W. F., Albernaz, A. K. M., Schroth, G., Fearnside, P. M., Bergen, S., Venticinque, E. M., & Da Costa, C. (2002). Predictors of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00721.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.