Cited by 667Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Roads, deforestation, and the mitigating effect of protected areas in the Amazon

Barber, Christopher P., Cochrane, Mark A., Souza, Carlos M., Laurance, William F.·2014·Biological Conservation

Abstract

Roads have a major impact on Amazon deforestation. However, the effects of the rapidly growing network of illegal or unofficial roads in the Amazon are usually not considered. We assessed relationships between past deforestation and existing networks of highways, navigable rivers, and all other roads, including more than 190,000km of unofficial roads. We found that deforestation was much higher near roads and rivers than elsewhere in the Amazon; nearly 95% of all deforestation occurred within 5.5km of roads or 1km of rivers. Protected areas near roads and rivers had much lower deforestation (10.9%) than did unprotected areas near roads and rivers (43.6%). If one assumes that existing protected areas halt deforestation, then we estimate that 39,462km2 of expected forest clearing would have been avoided. However, if one assumes that protected areas merely displace deforestation to other locations, then we estimate that 34,501km2 of expected clearing would have been displaced elsewhere. We conclude that proximity to transportation networks, particularly the rapidly growing unofficial road network, is a major proximate driver of deforestation in Amazonia and that protected areas are having a strong mitigating effect on that risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proximity to roads, rivers, and mines and elevation and rainfall are significant predictors of deforestation.

    “Existing literature has found that proximity to roads, rivers, and mines and elevation and rainfall are significant predictors of deforestation”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barber, C. P., Cochrane, M. A., Souza, C. M., & Laurance, W. F.
Affiliations
  • South Dakota State University (US)
  • James Cook University (AU)
Corresponding author
Barber, Christopher P.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
177
Pages
203-209
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115058414
Cited by
667
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 3
FWCI
27.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX07AF16G, NNX08AU94H, NNX11AB89G)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
Amazon deforestation, protected areas, transportation networks, navigable rivers, forest clearing, Amazon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review