Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three hundred years of forest and land‐use change in Massachusetts, USA

Hall, Brian, Motzkin, Glenn, Foster, David R., Syfert, Mindy, Burk, John·2002·Journal of Biogeography

Abstract

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to document changes in forest composition, structure and distribution across Massachusetts, USA, from the time of European settlement (seventeenth century) to the present, and to investigate environmental and historical influences on regional patterns of variation. Location The study area encompasses the State of Massachusetts (69.9–73.5°E, 41.3–42.9°N), a 21,000‐km 2 area in the north‐eastern United States. Methods A wide range of historical sources was used to document changes in land use and land cover for the historical period. Witness trees from early land surveys enabled us to evaluate vegetation patterns prior to widespread European settlement, and to compare historical and modern species composition. Nineteenth century maps of forest cover and contemporary agricultural censuses documented forest patterns during the peak agricultural period. Geographic Information System analyses were used to relate variation in climate, geology and land‐use history to historical and modern forest composition. Results Massachusetts has a complex east‐to‐west environmental gradient involving changes in physiography, climate, geology and natural disturbance. Until the middle of the twentieth century, agriculture was the most important land‐use across the region; although the percentage of land in agriculture and the timing of major land‐use changes were remarkably consistent across the state, historical forest patch sizes varied locally and regionally in relation to physiography. Forest composition of both early historical and modern forests is most strongly related to environmental conditions, especially variation in climate. Historical land‐use resulted in a state‐wide increase in early successional tree species and a dramatic, although recovering, change in forest structure. Main conclusions At a regional scale, environmental conditions apparently control broad patterns of variation in vegetation composition. Historical land‐use practices were relatively homogenous across Massachusetts and local variation was reduced through data averaging at broad spatial scales. At finer spatial scales, historical land‐use has strong and persistent impacts on vegetation composition and structure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00790.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Hall, B., Motzkin, G., Foster, D. R., Syfert, M., & Burk, J.
Venue
Journal of Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
29
Issue
10-11
Pages
1319-1335
ISSN
  • 0305-0270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2699
OpenAlex
W2072429820
Cited by
310
References
67
FWCI
13.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three hundred years of forest and land‐use change in Massachusetts, USA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00790.x
The paper
Hall, B., Motzkin, G., Foster, D. R., Syfert, M., & Burk, J. (2002). Three hundred years of forest and land‐use change in Massachusetts, USA. Journal of Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00790.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.