The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A resistant-kernel model of connectivity for amphibians that breed in vernal pools
Abstract
Abstract: Pool‐breeding amphibian populations operate at multiple scales, from the individual pool to surrounding upland habitat to clusters of pools. When metapopulation dynamics play a role in long‐term viability, conservation efforts limited to the protection of individual pools or even pools with associated upland habitat may be ineffective over the long term if connectivity among pools is not maintained. Connectivity becomes especially important and difficult to assess in regions where suburban sprawl is rapidly increasing land development, road density, and traffic rates. We developed a model of connectivity among vernal pools for the four ambystomatid salamanders that occur in Massachusetts and applied it to the nearly 30,000 potential ephemeral wetlands across the state. The model was based on a modification of the kernel estimator (a density estimator commonly used in home range studies) that takes landscape resistance into account. The model was parameterized with empirical migration distances for spotted salamanders ( Ambystoma maculatum ), dispersal distances for marbled salamanders ( A. opacum ), and expert‐derived estimates of landscape resistance. The model ranked vernal pools in Massachusetts by local, neighborhood, and regional connectivity and by an integrated measure of connectivity, both statewide and within ecoregions. The most functionally connected pool complexes occurred in southeastern and northeastern Massachusetts, areas with rapidly increasing suburban development. In a sensitivity analysis estimates of pool connectivity were relatively insensitive to uncertainty in parameter estimates, especially at the local and neighborhood scales. Our connectivity model could be used to prioritize conservation efforts for vernal‐pool amphibian populations at broader scales than traditional pool‐based approaches.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These strategies are in active development and include the detection of barriers that impede movement.
“These strategies are in active development [57]–[59], and include the detection of barriers that impede movement [56].”
From Applying circuit theory for corridor expansion and management at regional scales: tiling, pinch points, and omnidirectional connectivity (2014) · cites this paper as [59]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04310.x · DOI
- 10.2307/1935620 · DOI
- Burne M. R., 2001, Massachusetts aerial photo survey of potential vernal pools. Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program
- 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Colburn E. A., 2004, Vernal pools: natural history and conservation
- 10.2307/3802629 · DOI
- 10.1670/155-02A · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99086.x · DOI
- 10.1139/z92-108 · DOI
- Gamble L. R.2004.Landscape‐level population structure and local variability in marbled salamanders (Ambystoma opacum) of western Massachusetts: applied lessons from metapopulation theory.M.S. thesis.Department of Natural Resources Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst Massachusetts .
- 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[298:LORBZF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03160862 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11273-004-7522-9 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00557.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00790.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00548.x · DOI
- 10.1890/03-5125 · DOI
- 10.5751/ES-00015-010104 · DOI
- 10.5962/bhl.title.62955 · DOI
- McDonough‐Haughley C., 2007, Spotted salamander dispersal across a forested landscape fragmented by a golf course, Journal of Wildlife Management, 71
- 10.2307/1447434 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.00129.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10061509.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.253.5022.892 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00018.x · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1021390527698 · DOI
- 10.1139/z03-046 · DOI
- 10.1086/320863 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01085.x · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022936613275 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97274.x · DOI
- Semlitsch R. D., 2003, Amphibian conservation
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.98166.x · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-012178075-3/50010-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2326:LTDDOA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99161.x · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3519:SADAID]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.2307/1441075 · DOI
- 10.2307/1938423 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps
Koen, E. L., Bowman, J., Sadowski, C., & Walpole, A. A. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12197 · Cited by 293
Pelletier, D., Clark, M., Anderson, M. G., Rayfield, B., Wulder, M. A., & Cardille, J. A. (2014) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084135 · Cited by 158
Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation
Unnithan Kumar, S., & Cushman, S. A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20370-w · Cited by 83
Self-citationComparison of methods for estimating omnidirectional landscape connectivity
Phillips, P., Clark, M. M., Baral, S., Koen, E. L., & Bowman, J. (2021) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-021-01254-2 · Cited by 62
Howey, M. C. L. (2015) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2015.10.007 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- COMPTON, B. W., McGARIGAL, K., CUSHMAN, S. A., & GAMBLE, L. R.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 788-799
- ISSN
- 0888-8892
- 1523-1739
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review