Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A resistant-kernel model of connectivity for amphibians that breed in vernal pools

COMPTON, BRADLEY W., McGARIGAL, KEVIN, CUSHMAN, SAMUEL A., GAMBLE, LLOYD R.·2007·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: Pool‐breeding amphibian populations operate at multiple scales, from the individual pool to surrounding upland habitat to clusters of pools. When metapopulation dynamics play a role in long‐term viability, conservation efforts limited to the protection of individual pools or even pools with associated upland habitat may be ineffective over the long term if connectivity among pools is not maintained. Connectivity becomes especially important and difficult to assess in regions where suburban sprawl is rapidly increasing land development, road density, and traffic rates. We developed a model of connectivity among vernal pools for the four ambystomatid salamanders that occur in Massachusetts and applied it to the nearly 30,000 potential ephemeral wetlands across the state. The model was based on a modification of the kernel estimator (a density estimator commonly used in home range studies) that takes landscape resistance into account. The model was parameterized with empirical migration distances for spotted salamanders ( Ambystoma maculatum ), dispersal distances for marbled salamanders ( A. opacum ), and expert‐derived estimates of landscape resistance. The model ranked vernal pools in Massachusetts by local, neighborhood, and regional connectivity and by an integrated measure of connectivity, both statewide and within ecoregions. The most functionally connected pool complexes occurred in southeastern and northeastern Massachusetts, areas with rapidly increasing suburban development. In a sensitivity analysis estimates of pool connectivity were relatively insensitive to uncertainty in parameter estimates, especially at the local and neighborhood scales. Our connectivity model could be used to prioritize conservation efforts for vernal‐pool amphibian populations at broader scales than traditional pool‐based approaches.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00674.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04310.x · DOI
  2. 10.2307/1935620 · DOI
  3. Burne M. R., 2001, Massachusetts aerial photo survey of potential vernal pools. Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program
  4. 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Colburn E. A., 2004, Vernal pools: natural history and conservation
  6. 10.2307/3802629 · DOI
  7. 10.1670/155-02A · DOI
  8. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99086.x · DOI
  9. 10.1139/z92-108 · DOI
  10. Gamble L. R.2004.Landscape‐level population structure and local variability in marbled salamanders (Ambystoma opacum) of western Massachusetts: applied lessons from metapopulation theory.M.S. thesis.Department of Natural Resources Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst Massachusetts .
  11. 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[298:LORBZF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/BF03160862 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s11273-004-7522-9 · DOI
  14. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00557.x · DOI
  15. 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00790.x · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00548.x · DOI
  17. 10.1890/03-5125 · DOI
  18. 10.5751/ES-00015-010104 · DOI
  19. 10.5962/bhl.title.62955 · DOI
  20. McDonough‐Haughley C., 2007, Spotted salamander dispersal across a forested landscape fragmented by a golf course, Journal of Wildlife Management, 71
  21. 10.2307/1447434 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.00129.x · DOI
  23. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10061509.x · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.253.5022.892 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00018.x · DOI
  26. 10.1023/A:1021390527698 · DOI
  27. 10.1139/z03-046 · DOI
  28. 10.1086/320863 · DOI
  29. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01085.x · DOI
  30. 10.1023/A:1022936613275 · DOI
  31. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97274.x · DOI
  32. Semlitsch R. D., 2003, Amphibian conservation
  33. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.98166.x · DOI
  34. 10.1016/B978-012178075-3/50010-6 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 · DOI
  36. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2326:LTDDOA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x · DOI
  38. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99161.x · DOI
  39. 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3519:SADAID]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  40. 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  41. 10.2307/1441075 · DOI
  42. 10.2307/1938423 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
COMPTON, B. W., McGARIGAL, K., CUSHMAN, S. A., & GAMBLE, L. R.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-21
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
788-799
ISSN
  • 0888-8892
  • 1523-1739
Cited by
283
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review