The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the validity of Bergmann's rule
Abstract
Aim We reviewed the occurrence of Bergmann's rule in birds (ninety‐four species) and mammals (149 species), using only studies where statistical significance of the results was tested. We also tested whether studies using different characters as surrogates of body size have a different tendency to conform to Bergmann's rule, whether body size and nest type (in birds) have an influence on the tendency to conform to the rule, and whether sedentary birds conform to the rule more than migratory birds. Location Worldwide. Methods We reviewed published data on geographic and temporal variation in body size, using only studies where the statistical significance of the results was tested. We asked how many species conform to the rule out of all species studied in each order and family. Results Over 72% of the birds and 65% of the mammal species follow Bergmann's rule. An overall tendency to follow the rule occurs also within orders and families. Studies using body mass in mammals show the greatest tendency to adhere to Bergmann's rule (linear measurements and dental measurements show a weaker tendency); while in birds, studies using body mass and other surrogates (linear measurements and egg size) show a similar tendency. Birds of different body mass categories exhibit a similar tendency to follow Bergmann's rule, while in mammals the lower body size categories (4–50 and 50–500 g) show a significantly lower tendency to conform to the rule. Sedentary birds tend to conform to Bergmann's rule more than migratory species. Nest type does not affect the tendency to conform to Bergmann's rule. Main conclusions Bergmann's rule is a valid ecological generalization for birds and mammals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Cited by
Bergmann's Rule – what's in a name?
Meiri, S. (2011) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00577.x · Cited by 253
Self-citationThermoregulation in endotherms: physiological principles and ecological consequences
Rezende, E. L., & Bacigalupe, L. D. (2015) · Journal of Comparative Physiology B · doi:10.1007/s00360-015-0909-5 · Cited by 83
Higginson, A. D., McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (2012) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/664457 · Cited by 52
Sargis, E. J., Millien, V., Woodman, N., & Olson, L. E. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3682 · Cited by 32
Andrew, S. C., Awasthy, M., Griffith, A. D., Nakagawa, S., & Griffith, S. C. (2018) · The Auk · doi:10.1642/auk-17-129.1 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Meiri, S., & Dayan, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-351
- ISSN
- 0305-0270 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2699
- OpenAlex
- W2121322568
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the validity of Bergmann's rule. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00837.x
- The paper
- Meiri, S., & Dayan, T. (2003). On the validity of Bergmann's rule. Journal of Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00837.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.