Cited by 52Physiological and biochemical adaptationsAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolution and Paleontology Studies

The Starvation-Predation Trade-Off Predicts Trends in Body Size, Muscularity, and Adiposity between and within Taxa

Higginson, Andrew D., McNamara, John M., Houston, Alasdair I.·2012·The American Naturalist

Abstract

The storage of lipids to buffer energy shortage may incur such costs as increased vulnerability to predation, and animals may be more muscular in order to reduce such costs. If muscle and lipid mass interact to determine survival, then both the muscularity and the adiposity of animals will be affected by factors such as predator density and food availability. Here we explore how adiposity and muscularity may depend on such factors. We confirm the expectation that adiposity should decrease with the risk of predation and increase with the frequency of interruptions to the food supply. More surprisingly, the predicted relationships between skeletal size, muscularity, and adiposity qualitatively depended on various factors: for example, adiposity should increase with foraging costs only for small animals and should decrease with total body mass if competition for food is intense. Furthermore, if the locomotive costs of carrying lipids are low, then adiposity should increase with body mass, whereas if such costs are high, then adiposity should decrease with body mass. These predictions are supported by observations of variation between and within species. Our approach demonstrates that broad patterns of body composition can be understood in terms of the fundamental ecological trade-off between starvation and predation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/664457

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lower set point of body fatness protects against death by starvation, whereas the upper set point limits body fatness and lowers the risk of death by predation.

    “The lower set point of body fatness—for regulating food intake—protects against death by starvation, whereas the upper set point limits body fatness, which lowers the risk of death by predation (Gosler et al. 2002, Higginson et al. 2012).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Higginson et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higginson, A. D., McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
2012-03
Volume
179
Issue
3
Pages
338-350
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2034904356
Cited by
52
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
adiposity, muscularity, body size, fat deposition, energy reserves, predation risk, food availability, foraging costs, body composition, interspecific variation, intraspecific variation, body mass
MeSH terms
Animals, Competitive Behavior, Models, Biological, Nutritional Requirements, Population Density, Species Specificity, Muscle, Skeletal, Food Chain, Body Size, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review