Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: relation to climate and topography

Guisan, Antoine, Hofer, Ulrich·2003·Journal of Biogeography

Abstract

Aim To explore the respective power of climate and topography to predict the distribution of reptiles in Switzerland, hence at a mesoscale level. A more detailed knowledge of these relationships, in combination with maps of the potential distribution derived from the models, is a valuable contribution to the design of conservation strategies. Location All of Switzerland. Methods Generalized linear models are used to derive predictive habitat distribution models from eco‐geographical predictors in a geographical information system, using species data from a field survey conducted between 1980 and 1999. Results The maximum amount of deviance explained by climatic models is 65%, and 50% by topographical models. Low values were obtained with both sets of predictors for three species that are widely distributed in all parts of the country (Anguis fragilis, Coronella austriaca, and Natrix natrix), a result that suggests that including other important predictors, such as resources, should improve the models in further studies. With respect to topographical predictors, low values were also obtained for two species where we anticipated a strong response to aspect and slope, Podarcis muralis and Vipera aspis. Main conclusions Overall, both models and maps derived from climatic predictors more closely match the actual reptile distributions than those based on topography. These results suggest that the distributional limits of reptile species with a restricted range in Switzerland are largely set by climatic, predominantly temperature‐related, factors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00914.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.t01-1-980116.x · DOI
  2. 10.1080/02693799208901899 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/2404755 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/BF00048865 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00205-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00194-1 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1996.tb01262.x · DOI
  8. 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/1467-9876.00147 · DOI
  10. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97269.x · DOI
  11. Corsi F., 2000, Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences, 389
  12. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00202-8 · DOI
  13. Franklin J., 2000, Terrain analysis: principles and applications
  14. Gasc J.‐P., 1997, Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Europe, 496
  15. Guisan A., 2001, Les reptiles de Suisse
  16. 10.1127/phyto/30/2000/353 · DOI
  17. 10.1890/06-0539 · DOI
  18. 10.1023/A:1009841519580 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00204-1 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1007/978-3-0348-8316-0 · DOI
  21. 10.1046/j.0021-8901.2001.00668.x · DOI
  22. Jones M.T., 2002, Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale, 411
  23. 10.2307/3237290 · DOI
  24. Leser H., 1977, Feld‐ und Labormethoden des Geomorphologie, 10.1515/9783110857467 · DOI
  25. Longmore R., 1986, Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia. Number 7
  26. 10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00113-1 · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00647.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00209.x · DOI
  30. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0037:PGWLRL]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  31. Monney J.‐C., 1996, Biologie comparée de Vipera aspis L. et de Vipera berus L. (Reptilia, Ophidia, Viperidae) dans une station des Préalpes bernoises, 174
  32. 10.2307/3236378 · DOI
  33. Nix H., 1986, Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia, 4
  34. OFT, 2002, Digital height model level 2, product information
  35. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00190-4 · DOI
  36. 10.2307/2845088 · DOI
  37. Patthey P., 2003, Habitat and corridor selection of an expanding red deer (Cevus elaphus) population
  38. 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00322-7 · DOI
  39. Pereira J.M.C., 1991, GIS‐based habitat modelling using logistic multiple regression:a study of the Mt Graham Red Squirrel, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57, 1475
  40. Scott J.M., 2002, Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale
  41. 10.1023/A:1021342611769 · DOI
  42. Vincent P.J., 1983, Poisson regression models of species abundance, Journal of Biogeography, 10, 153, 10.2307/2844625 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00199-0 · DOI

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Guisan, A., & Hofer, U.
Venue
Journal of Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07-23
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
1233-1243
ISSN
  • 0305-0270
  • 1365-2699
Cited by
162
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review