Cited by 9,088Species Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data

Open access
Elith*, Jane, H. Graham*, Catherine, P. Anderson, Robert, Dudík, Miroslav, Ferrier, Simon, Guisan, Antoine, J. Hijmans, Robert, Huettmann, Falk +19 more·2006·Ecography

Abstract

Prediction of species’ distributions is central to diverse applications in ecology, evolution and conservation science. There is increasing electronic access to vast sets of occurrence records in museums and herbaria, yet little effective guidance on how best to use this information in the context of numerous approaches for modelling distributions. To meet this need, we compared 16 modelling methods over 226 species from 6 regions of the world, creating the most comprehensive set of model comparisons to date. We used presence‐only data to fit models, and independent presence‐absence data to evaluate the predictions. Along with well‐established modelling methods such as generalised additive models and GARP and BIOCLIM, we explored methods that either have been developed recently or have rarely been applied to modelling species’ distributions. These include machine‐learning methods and community models, both of which have features that may make them particularly well suited to noisy or sparse information, as is typical of species’ occurrence data. Presence‐only data were effective for modelling species’ distributions for many species and regions. The novel methods consistently outperformed more established methods. The results of our analysis are promising for the use of data from museums and herbaria, especially as methods suited to the noise inherent in such data improve.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elith*, J., H. Graham*, C., P. Anderson, R., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., J. Hijmans, R., Huettmann, F., R. Leathwick, J., Lehmann, A., Li, J., G. Lohmann, L., A. Loiselle, B., Manion, G., Moritz, C., Nakamura, M., Nakazawa, Y., McC. M. Overton, J., Townsend Peterson, A., J. Phillips, S., Richardson, K., Scachetti‐Pereira, R., E. Schapire, R., Soberón, J., Williams, S., S. Wisz, M., & E. Zimmermann, N.
Affiliations
  • University of New England (AU)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
  • info fauna (CH)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (MX)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental (BR)
  • James Cook University (AU)
Venue
Ecography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-29
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
129-151
ISSN
  • 0906-7590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0587
OpenAlex
W2112315008
Cited by
9,088
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 289 · 2025: 522 · 2024: 539 · 2023: 550 · 2022: 597 · 2021: 588 · 2020: 614 · 2019: 515 · 2018: 513 · 2017: 465 · 2016: 492 · 2015: 436 · 2014: 484 · 2013: 536 · 2012: 471
FWCI
136.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecography (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
  • DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
species distribution modeling, presence-only data, species occurrence records, model comparison, machine learning, community model, generalized additive models, BIOCLIM, GARP, data sparsity, conservation science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review