Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Critical care nurses’ decision‐making activities in the natural clinical setting

Bucknall, Tracey K.·2000·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

• This article reports on observation of 18 nurses in urban and rural based critical care settings. • The purpose of the study was to observe and describe the decision‐making activities of critical care nurses within natural clinical settings. • During the 2‐hour observation, the researcher dictated a detailed commentary on to audio‐tape of each nurse’s actions. Tapes were transcribed and subjected to content analysis. • Findings indicated three main categories of decisions. Decision frequencies were linked to nurses’ critical care experience, appointment level, and location, as well as nursing shifts. • The findings are discussed in relation to previous empirical evidence and the implications for practice. • The author concludes that future research should be directed towards measuring the contextual influences on nurses’ decision‐making on the outcome of patient care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00333.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Bucknall, T. K.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
25-36
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W1972707552
Cited by
167
References
0
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical care nurses’ decision‐making activities in the natural clinical setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00333.x
The paper
Bucknall, T. K. (2000). Critical care nurses’ decision‐making activities in the natural clinical setting. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00333.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.