Cited by 33Nursing education and managementInnovations in Medical EducationHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Technological competence as a fundamental structure of learning in critical care nursing: a phenomenological study

Little, Christine V.·2000·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Post-registration education programmes are frequently informed by nationally agreed curriculum frameworks. Although these aim to promote comparability between similarly focused clinical courses, inconsistencies have recently been identified across a range of critical care curricula. This suggests that broad-based frameworks may be insufficiently sensitive to local learning needs. This study was concerned with the extent to which the curriculum met the learning needs of 10 post-registration critical care students and, in particular, aimed to explore the meaning of learning to the students themselves. The study revealed technological competence to be a necessary foundation to the development of clinical practice and this is discussed from a philosophical perspective which allows the nature of contemporary nursing practice to be reconceptualized. It is argued that curriculum development for clinically based, post-registration courses can be constructively informed by local consultation and that phenomenological study can complement more traditional approaches often relied upon in educational research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00395.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-expert nurses were task-focused because they had not yet learnt or developed adequate procedural knowledge to assist them to perform new tasks, or similar tasks in a new environment.

    “Non-expert nurses were task-focused because they had not yet learnt or developed adequate procedural knowledge to assist them to perform new tasks, or similar tasks in a new environment (Coulon et al 1996, Little 2000).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Little, C. V.
Affiliations
Bournemouth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Little, Christine V.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-05
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
391-399
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2161510931
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
technological competence, critical care nursing education, post-registration education, nursing curriculum development, curriculum framework, student learning needs, meaning of learning, phenomenology of learning, clinical practice development, nursing philosophy
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Competency-Based Education, Critical Care, Curriculum, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Learning, Nursing Methodology Research, Models, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review