The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competition between tree seedlings and herbaceous vegetation: support for a theory of resource supply and demand
Abstract
1 We measured competition intensity (CI) between herbaceous vegetation and tree seedlings (Quercus macrocarpa and Q. ellipsoidalis) along an experimental moisture–light gradient. Contrasting theories were tested by comparing variation in competition intensity to changes in neighbour biomass and resource supply and demand. 2 CI based on survival was inversely correlated with net soil water supply (gross supply minus demand by herbaceous vegetation). CI was not positively correlated with either gross resource supply or neighbour biomass, contrary to predictions of Grime's triangular model for plant strategies. 3 Many of the inconsistencies and conflicting results that have characterized the recent literature on plant competition could be eliminated if changes in competition intensity along a resource gradient are compared with changes in net resource supply rather than changes in productivity or neighbour biomass. 4 Tree seedling success in savannas and grasslands may be strongly influenced by the intensity of competition from herbaceous vegetation. Factors that reduce soil water content are likely to increase competition intensity (and reduce seedling success) in these environments, while factors that increase soil water content will favour seedling success through decreased competition for water with herbaceous vegetation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Exclusion in Herbaceous Vegetation
GRIME, J. P. (1973) · Nature · doi:10.1038/242344a0 · Cited by 2,507
McNaughton, S. J. (1983) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942533 · Cited by 524
Taylor, D. R., Aarssen, L. W., & Loehle, C. (1990) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545432 · Cited by 470
Cited by
Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions
Shea, K. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02495-3 · Cited by 2,271
Fire, resprouting and variability: a recipe for grass–tree coexistence in savanna
Higgins, S. I., Bond, W. J., & Trollope, W. S. W. (2000) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00435.x · Cited by 1,073
An integrated framework of plant form and function: the belowground perspective
Weigelt, A., Mommer, L., Andraczek, K., Iversen, C. M., Bergmann, J., Bruelheide, H., Fan, Y., Freschet, G. T., Guerrero‐Ramírez, N. R., Kattge, J., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17590 · Cited by 486
Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs
Gioria, M., & Osborne, B. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00501 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, M. A., Wrage, K. J., & Reich, P. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 652-661
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2019523552
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition between tree seedlings and herbaceous vegetation: support for a theory of resource supply and demand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00087.x
- The paper
- Davis, M. A., Wrage, K. J., & Reich, P. B. (1998). Competition between tree seedlings and herbaceous vegetation: support for a theory of resource supply and demand. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00087.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.