Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 486

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An integrated framework of plant form and function: the belowground perspective

Open access
Weigelt, Alexandra, Mommer, Liesje, Andraczek, Karl, Iversen, Colleen M., Bergmann, Joana, Bruelheide, Helge, Fan, Ying, Freschet, Grégoire T., Guerrero‐Ramírez, Nathaly R., Kattge, Jens, Kuyper, Thom W., Laughlin, Daniel C., Meier, Ina C., van der Plas, Fons, Poorter, Hendrik, Roumet, Catherine, van Ruijven, Jasper, Sabatini, Francesco Maria, Semchenko, Marina, Sweeney, Christopher J., Valverde‐Barrantes, Oscar J., York, Larry M., McCormack, M. Luke·2021·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Plant trait variation drives plant function, community composition and ecosystem processes. However, our current understanding of trait variation disproportionately relies on aboveground observations. Here we integrate root traits into the global framework of plant form and function. We developed and tested an overarching conceptual framework that integrates two recently identified root trait gradients with a well‐established aboveground plant trait framework. We confronted our novel framework with published relationships between above‐ and belowground trait analogues and with multivariate analyses of above‐ and belowground traits of 2510 species. Our traits represent the leaf and root conservation gradients (specific leaf area, leaf and root nitrogen concentration, and root tissue density), the root collaboration gradient (root diameter and specific root length) and the plant size gradient (plant height and rooting depth). We found that an integrated, whole‐plant trait space required as much as four axes. The two main axes represented the fast–slow ‘conservation’ gradient on which leaf and fine‐root traits were well aligned, and the ‘collaboration’ gradient in roots. The two additional axes were separate, orthogonal plant size axes for height and rooting depth. This perspective on the multidimensional nature of plant trait variation better encompasses plant function and influence on the surrounding environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.17590

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 131 references

Metadata

Authors
Weigelt, A., Mommer, L., Andraczek, K., Iversen, C. M., Bergmann, J., Bruelheide, H., Fan, Y., Freschet, G. T., Guerrero‐Ramírez, N. R., Kattge, J., Kuyper, T. W., Laughlin, D. C., Meier, I. C., van der Plas, F., Poorter, H., Roumet, C., van Ruijven, J., Sabatini, F. M., Semchenko, M., Sweeney, C. J., Valverde‐Barrantes, O. J., York, L. M., & McCormack, M. L.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-07-30
Volume
232
Issue
1
Pages
42-59
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W3174994909
Cited by
486
References
131
FWCI
39.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An integrated framework of plant form and function: the belowground perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.17590
The paper
Weigelt, A., Mommer, L., Andraczek, K., Iversen, C. M., Bergmann, J., Bruelheide, H., Fan, Y., Freschet, G. T., Guerrero‐Ramírez, N. R., Kattge, J., Kuyper, T. W., Laughlin, D. C., Meier, I. C., van der Plas, F., Poorter, H., Roumet, C., van Ruijven, J., Sabatini, F. M., Semchenko, M., . . . McCormack, M. L. (2021). An integrated framework of plant form and function: the belowground perspective. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17590

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.