Cited by 361Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Alternative successional pathways in the Amazon Basin

Open access
Mesquita, Rita C.G., Ickes, Kalan, Ganade, Gislene, Williamson, G. Bruce·2001·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Successional pathways were evaluated in two Amazonian secondary forest communities with different land‐use histories. Sites which had been clearcut without subsequent use were dominated after 6–10 years by the pioneer genus Cecropia (Moraceae), whereas those used for pasture before abandonment were dominated by the pioneer genus Vismia (Clusiaceae). There were 58 plant families and 300 species identified in Cecropia stands but only 43 families and 147 species were identified in Vismia stands. There were 77 species in common (Sorensen similarity = 0.34). Differences in species number and composition of recruiting individuals between stand types were significant and were a function of the dominant pioneer genus, stem density, distance from primary forest, and land‐use history. Regeneration under Vismia canopy was dominated by small Vismia individuals (25% of plants < 2 cm basal diameter), whereas regeneration under Cecropia canopy was more diverse and did not include a single young Cecropia. The number of regenerating plants in both secondary stand types dropped off sharply with distance (5, 25, 50, and 100 m) from primary forest, suggesting that seed dispersal was limiting plant recruitment. Species richness also declined with distance and could be explained by the decline in plant density. Species richness in Cecropia stands increased linearly with plant density, but in Vismia stands the richness increase with density was a decelerating function. For the central Amazon, secondary succession involves a more rapid return of primary forest species if deforestation is not followed by use as pasture before abandonment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00583.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In stable forest regions of the Amazon with annual rainfall above 1,800 mm, forest cover usually recovers within a few years or decades after disturbances, yet forest composition and functioning may remain degraded for decades or centuries.

    “In stable forest regions of the Amazon with annual rainfall above 1,800 mm (Extended Data Fig. 1b), forest cover usually recovers within a few years or decades after disturbances, yet forest composition and functioning may remain degraded for decades or centuries84–87.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Summary describes secondary forest stands 6–10 years after clearing, and the Introduction reports that recovery to primary forest may take 100–200 years on lightly used sites or at least 500 years on heavily used sites. The Methods give mean rainfall of 2,200 mm at the study site. The paper does not establish that forest cover usually recovers within years or decades across stable Amazonian regions above 1,800 mm of rainfall, or give a general timescale for recovery of forest functioning. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Vismia forests are common in old abandoned pastures managed with fire, and are relatively stable because Vismia trees favour recruitment of Vismia seedlings over other tree species.

    “For instance, Vismia forests are common in old abandoned pastures managed with fire85, and are relatively stable, because Vismia trees favour recruitment of Vismia seedlings in detriment of other tree species88,89.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Summary and ‘regeneration under Vismia- and Cecropia-dominated canopies’ report that abandoned-pasture stands were Vismia-dominated and that many recruits beneath Vismia were Vismia seedlings or clonal sprouts. The paper describes Vismia as persistent, but says its effect on other species’ regeneration is a possibility and that land-use history may confound it. The claim presents that proposed cause as established and calls the recruits seedlings without allowing for sprouts. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the degraded forest trajectory, feedbacks often involve competition between trees and other opportunistic plants, as well as interactions between deforestation, fire and seed limitation.

    “In the ‘degraded forest’ trajectory, feedbacks often involve competition between trees and other opportunistic plants85,90,92, as well as interactions between deforestation, fire and seed limitation84,87,105.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [85]

    The ‘what drives successional pathways in the Amazon?’ section (page unavailable) links deforestation and periodic burning to different regeneration pathways, while the ‘regeneration as a function of distance from primary forest edge’ section reports seed-dispersal limits. The paper also discusses dominant pioneer plants retarding regeneration, but it does not establish competition between trees and other opportunistic plants as a frequent feedback. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bazzaz, F.A. (1991) Regeneration of tropical forests: physiological responses of pioneer and secondary species. Rainforest Regeneration and Management (ed. J .N.R. Jeffers), pp. 91-118. MAB Series, v. 6. UNESCO, Paris.
  2. Denslow, J.S. (1987) Tropical rainforest gaps and tree species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics , 18 , 431-451.
  3. Greig-Smith, P. (1952a) Ecological observations on degraded and secondary forest in Trinidad, British West Indies I. General features of the vegetation. Journal of Ecology , 40 , 283-315.
  4. Greig-Smith, P. (1952b) Ecological observations on degraded and secondary forest in Trinidad, British West Indies II. Structure of the communities. Journal of Ecology , 40 , 316330.
  5. Hall, J.R. &amp; Okali, D.U.U. (1979) A structural and floristic analysis of woody fallow vegetation near Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of Ecology , 67 , 321-346.
  6. Lovejoy, T.E. &amp; Bierregaard, R.O. (1990) Central Amazonian forest fragments and the Minimum Critical Size of Ecosystems Project. Four Neotropical Rainforests (ed. A.H. Gentry), pp. 60-71. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
  7. Lucas, R.M., Honzak, M., Amaral, I., Curran, P .J., Foody, G.M. &amp; Amaral, S. (1998) Composição florística, biomassa e estrutura de florestas tropicais em regeneração: uma avaliação por sensoriamento remoto. Floresta Amazônica: Dinâmica, Regeneração E Manejo (eds C. Gascon &amp; P. Moutinho), pp. 61-82. MCT - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
  8. Maury-Lechon, G. (1991) Comparative dynamics of tropical rain forest regeneration in French Guyana. Rainforest Regeneration and Management (ed. J .N.R. Jeffers), pp. 285293. MAB Series, v. 6. UNESCO, Paris.
  9. Nepstad, D., Uhl, C. &amp; Serrao, E.A. (1990) Surmounting barriers to forest regeneration in abandoned, highly degraded pastures: a case study from Paragominas, Para, Brazil. Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use of the Amazon Rain Forest (ed. A. Anderson), pp. 215-229. Columbia University Press, New York.
  10. Oliveira, A.A. (1997) Diversidade, estrutura e dinâmica do componente arbóreo de uma floresta de terra firme de Manaus, Amazonas. Doctoral thesis, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo.
  11. Rankin-de-Merona, J.M., Hutchings, R.W . &amp; Lovejoy, T.E. (1990) Tree mortality and recruitment over a five year period in undisturbed upland forest of the central Amazon. Four Neotropical Rainforests (ed. A.H. Gentry), pp. 573-584. Yale University Press, New Haven.
  12. Saldarriaga, J.G. (1985) Forest succession in the upper Rio Negro of Colombia and Venezuela . Doctoral thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
  13. Saldarriaga, J.G. &amp; Uhl, C. (1991) Recovery of forest vegetation following slash-and-burn agriculture in the Upper Rio Negro. Rain Forest Regeneration and Management, MAB, 6 (eds A. Gomes-Pompa, T.C. Whitmore &amp; M. Hadley), pp. 285-293. UNESCO, Paris.
  14. Schnitzer, S.A., Dalling, J.W . &amp; Carson, W .P . (2000) The impact of lianas on tree regeneration in tropical forest canopy gaps: evidence for an alternative pathway of gap-phase regeneration. Journal of Ecology , 88 , 655-666.
  15. Uhl, C., Buschbacker, R. &amp; Serrao, A.S. (1988) Abandoned pastures in Eastern Amazonia. I. Patterns of plant succession. Journal of Ecology , 76 , 663-681.
  16. Williamson, G.B. &amp; Mesquita, R.C.G. (in press) Effects of fire on rain forest regeneration in the Amazon Basin. Lessons from Amazonia: the Ecology and Conservation of a Fragmented Forest (eds R.O. Bierregaard Jr, C. Gascon, T. Lovejoy &amp; R.C.G. Mesquita). Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
  17. Williamson, G.B., Mesquita, R.C.G., Ickes, K. &amp; Ganade, G. (1998) Estratégias de pioneiras nos Neotrópicos. Floresta Amazônica: Dinâmica, Regeneração E Manejo (eds C. Gascon &amp; P . Moutinho), pp. 131-144. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil.
  18. Willson, M.F. &amp; Crome, F.H.J. (1989) Patterns of seed rain at the edge of a tropical Queensland rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology , 5 , 301-308.
  19. 13652745, 2001, 4, Downloaded from https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00583.x, Wiley Online Library on [03/11/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mesquita, R. C. G., Ickes, K., Ganade, G., & Williamson, G. B.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Corresponding author
Mesquita, Rita C.G.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-08
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
528-537
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2016369114
Cited by
361
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Louisiana State University
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
secondary succession, land use history, pasture abandonment, clear-cutting, Cecropia, Vismia, pioneer species, plant recruitment, seed dispersal limitation, species richness, stem density, floristic composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review