The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Large‐scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations
Open accessAbstract
1 We present a critical review of the application of metapopulation theory to the regional dynamics of plants. We consider whether there is evidence that regional populations of plants show a metapopulation structure. We then review the alternatives to the metapopulation regional population structure for plants. 2 Although metapopulation theory primarily deals with regional dynamics, it is, however, also commonly applied to patch dynamics within local populations (‘metapatch’ systems). These apparently analogous systems are very different: systems of patchy local populations do not exhibit the dissociation of processes operating at different spatial scales that is characteristic of metapopulations. 3 The parameters of classical metapopulation studies, such as colonization, re-colonization and extinction, may be hard to measure for many plant populations, in particular for populations with long-lived seedbanks. 4 The assumption of metapopulation theory that suitable habitat occurs as discrete patches within a matrix of unsuitable habitat is not always true, as regional populations of some species may exist on largely uninterrupted swathes of suitable habitat. Alternatively, suitable patches may be hard or impossible to define a priori. 5 Using detailed case studies from the literature we outline a possible classification of the spatial dynamics of plants at both regional and local scales. 6 At the regional scale we define: metapopulations, in the classic sense, where regional persistence is governed by the processes of patch colonization, extinction and recolonization; regional ensembles, systems of essentially unconnected local populations persisting in an ill-defined mosaic of suitable and unsuitable habitat; and spatially extended populations, essentially a single extended population occupying large tracts of suitable habitat, but whose regional dynamics are essentially a simple extension of local dynamics. 7 Although a range of forms of local spatial dynamics exist, these are qualitatively different from the forms of population structure at the regional level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Opdam, P., & Wascher, D. (2004) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.12.008 · Cited by 955
Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive
ACREMAN, M. C., & FERGUSON, A. J. D. (2010) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02181.x · Cited by 337
Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis
KEMP, P. S., & O'HANLEY, J. R. (2010) · Fisheries Management and Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2400.2010.00751.x · Cited by 297
Metapopulations and metacommunities: Combining spatial and temporal perspectives in plant ecology
Alexander, H. M., Foster, B. L., Ballantyne, F., Collins, C. D., Antonovics, J., & Holt, R. D. (2012) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01917.x · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Freckleton, R. P., & Watkinson, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05-19
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 419-434
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2153044883
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large‐scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00692.x
- The paper
- Freckleton, R. P., & Watkinson, A. R. (2002). Large‐scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00692.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.