The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis
Abstract
Abstract Techniques for assessing the impact of structural barriers on fish passage and for prioritising restoration actions are reviewed. Current survey methodologies are biased towards specific structures, primarily culverts and economically significant fish. Assessment criteria are often based on swimming capabilities of upstream migrating adult salmonids, while ignoring other life‐stages, non‐salmonid species, downstream migration and behaviour. The development of comprehensive and centrally owned geospatial inventories of barriers is essential. The collection, maintenance and dissemination of pertinent structural and environmental data can be technically, logistically and financially challenging. Standardised procedures are needed to rapidly and cost‐effectively survey large numbers of barriers over wide geographic areas. The prioritisation of barrier repair and removal projects is most often based on simple cost‐benefit analysis, whereby individual barriers are scored based on a set of assessment criteria and then ranked in order of priority. The benefits of using scoring‐and‐ranking systems, however, are unacceptably low because they consider barriers independently, thereby ignoring the cumulative, non‐additive impacts produced by multiple, spatially interconnected structures. Optimisation modelling offers a more robust approach for efficiently prioritising decision making in river restoration planning, allowing decision makers to account for key uncertainties and effectively balance multiple, possibly competing, environmental and socioeconomic goals and constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f80-017 · Cited by 9,984
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
Smith, A. F. M., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2345300 · Cited by 2,305
Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of River Systems in the Northern Third of the World
Dynesius, M., & Nilsson, C. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.266.5186.753 · Cited by 1,732
Lambeck, R. J. (1997) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96319.x · Cited by 1,103
Migration of Freshwater Fishes
(2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470999653 · Cited by 1,062
Videler, J. J. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1580-3 · Cited by 819
Umbrellas and flagships: Efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes?
Andelman, S. J., & Fagan, W. F. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.100126797 · Cited by 696
Roni, P., Beechie, T. J., Bilby, R. E., Leonetti, F. E., Pollock, M. M., & Pess, G. R. (2002) · North American Journal of Fisheries Management · doi:10.1577/1548-8675(2002)022<0001:arosrt>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 626
Roni, P., Hanson, K., & Beechie, T. (2008) · North American Journal of Fisheries Management · doi:10.1577/m06-169.1 · Cited by 615
Large‐scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations
Freckleton, R. P., & Watkinson, A. R. (2002) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00692.x · Cited by 480
Cited by
Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers
Grill, G., Lehner, B., Thieme, M., Geenen, B., Tickner, D., Antonelli, F., Babu, S., Borrelli, P., Cheng, L., Crochetiere, H., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9 · Cited by 2,473
More than one million barriers fragment Europe’s rivers
Belletti, B., Garcia de Leaniz, C., Jones, J., Bizzi, S., Börger, L., Segura, G., Castelletti, A., van de Bund, W., Aarestrup, K., Barry, J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3005-2 · Cited by 709
Self-citationCauses and consequences of habitat fragmentation in river networks
Fuller, M. R., Doyle, M. W., & Strayer, D. L. (2015) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12853 · Cited by 338
River restoration by dam removal: Enhancing connectivity at watershed scales
Magilligan, F. J., Graber, B. E., Nislow, K. H., Chipman, J. W., Sneddon, C. S., & Fox, C. A. (2016) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.12952/journal.elementa.000108 · Cited by 186
Enhancing ecosystem restoration efficiency through spatial and temporal coordination
Neeson, T. M., Ferris, M. C., Diebel, M. W., Doran, P. J., O’Hanley, J. R., & McIntyre, P. B. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1423812112 · Cited by 172
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- KEMP, P. S., & O'HANLEY, J. R.
- Venue
- Fisheries Management and Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 297-322
- ISSN
- 0969-997X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2400
- OpenAlex
- W1556119446
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2010.00751.x
- The paper
- KEMP, P. S., & O'HANLEY, J. R. (2010). Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis. Fisheries Management and Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2010.00751.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
